## 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

This forum is for the individual discussion thread that goes with each new comic.

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

cheweytoo
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 9:38 am UTC

### 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

title text: "There's data suggesting that this model may apply to deep-dish/thin-crust pizza. I've designed a thorough multi-year study to investigate this personally, but funding organizations keep denying my grant requests."

This inflation certainly seems to apply to pizza sizes around here:
A "large pizza" is now routinely bigger than the plate it is being served on.
I'm not aware of any newly popular, smaller, pizza-replacing food item though…

richP
Posts: 195
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 3:28 pm UTC

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

My graph-related OCD is going nuts... the graph rotation is off by ninety degrees. Time is the dependent variable gosh darn it!

moody7277
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 7:06 pm UTC
Location: Extreme south Texas

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

richP wrote:My graph-related OCD is going nuts... the graph rotation is off by ninety degrees. Time is the dependent variable gosh darn it!

Shame you're not an astronomer, they're used to axes going in weird directions.

On the pizza front, one wonders if the popularity of Detroit style pizza indicates we're at the end of branch 1 on the graph.
The story of my life in xkcdmafia:

Tigerlion wrote:Well, I imagine as the game progresses, various people will be getting moody.

BoomFrog wrote:I still have no idea what town moody really looks like.

cellocgw
Posts: 2067
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:40 pm UTC

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

richP wrote:My graph-related OCD is going nuts... the graph rotation is off by ninety degrees. Time is the dependent variable gosh darn it!

Naah, it's just a minor variation on waterfall and swimlane graphs. You must not be up on the latest Software Efficiency Methodologies(TM)
resume
Former OTTer
Vote cellocgw for President 2020. #ScienceintheWhiteHouse http://cellocgw.wordpress.com
"The Planck length is 3.81779e-33 picas." -- keithl
" Earth weighs almost exactly π milliJupiters" -- what-if #146, note 7

orthogon
Posts: 3103
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 7:52 am UTC
Location: The Airy 1830 ellipsoid

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

richP wrote:My graph-related OCD is going nuts... the graph rotation is off by ninety degrees. Time is the dependent variable gosh darn it!

I won't mention that panini is the plural, then. *twitch*

This phenomenon seems to run counter to shrinkflation, which affects goods sold in shops, as opposed to restaurants. Perhaps because you notice the size whilst you're still in the restaurant?

ETA Inb4: Yes, yes, panini is the plural in Italian, whilst in English, panini is singular. Descriptivism, etc. I just haven't let this one go yet. (I read an amusing column once, which said "'The spaghetti were delicious'? I don't think so.")

ETA2: Actually, spaghetti isn't as egregious, because it's Italian plural -> English mass noun, not Italian plural -> English singular. Italians would rarely have cause to refer to an individual spaghetto, whereas a panino is presumably a commonly ordered thing. But perhaps Italians never eat alone...
xtifr wrote:... and orthogon merely sounds undecided.

RickLeePhoto
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2018 5:51 pm UTC

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Also applies to cars.

Hiferator
Posts: 82
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:23 am UTC

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

There was a similar development with laptop screen sizes and "subnotebooks" that snuck in between netbooks and ever growing notebooks.

Pfhorrest
Posts: 5487
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:11 am UTC
Contact:

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

What I don't understand is the cell phone size trends.

I remember when tiny phones were what all the kids wanted. Smaller phones were better.

Now, bigger phones are better, and kids talk on tablets larger than their heads.

What caused the reversal?
Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of All Trades
"I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
The Codex Quaerendae (my philosophy) - The Chronicles of Quelouva (my fiction)

Hiferator
Posts: 82
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:23 am UTC

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Pfhorrest wrote:What caused the reversal?

The ability/desire to display things other than numbers and contact names.

But yes, some phablets are ridiculous.

orthogon
Posts: 3103
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 7:52 am UTC
Location: The Airy 1830 ellipsoid

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Pfhorrest wrote:What I don't understand is the cell phone size trends.

I remember when tiny phones were what all the kids wanted. Smaller phones were better.

Now, bigger phones are better, and kids talk on tablets larger than their heads.

What caused the reversal?

Smartphones. The small ones were great for phone calls, but sucked for doing the internets. Also, the kids that liked the small ones are now the square-oid parents of the ones carrying the Dom Jolly phones. Fashion was ever thus. (Edit: ninja'ed)
xtifr wrote:... and orthogon merely sounds undecided.

ChakatFirepaw
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 8:22 pm UTC

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

orthogon wrote:
richP wrote:My graph-related OCD is going nuts... the graph rotation is off by ninety degrees. Time is the dependent variable gosh darn it!

I won't mention that panini is the plural, then. *twitch*

This phenomenon seems to run counter to shrinkflation, which affects goods sold in shops, as opposed to restaurants. Perhaps because you notice the size whilst you're still in the restaurant?

This trend applies more to singular food items that are the focus of the sale rather than 'bulk' items.

You can see shrinkflation in things like the McDonald's fry cycle:

They have regular and large.
Then regular, a slightly smaller large and supersize.
Then small, an again slightly smaller large and a not quite so supersize.
Then small, medium and a slightly larger than we started large.
Then back to regular and large.

Reka
Posts: 264
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:21 pm UTC

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

There's gotta be something like this going on with the concentrations of detergents, too. Otherwise, we'd have doubled the strength of detergent so many times by now that it'd dissolve its container and be classified as a hazardous substance. Or something.

Godsguy
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:10 pm UTC

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Hiferator wrote:
Pfhorrest wrote:What caused the reversal?

The ability/desire to display things other than numbers and contact names.

But yes, some phablets are ridiculous.

Porn. Just say it. We (hetrosexual men) want to (sterotyipcally) see bigger boobies.
There is nothing, absolutely nothing, half so much worth doing as simply messing around in boats - Ken Grahame (Wind in the Willows)

Kewangji
Has Been Touched
Posts: 2255
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:20 pm UTC
Location: Lost in Translation
Contact:

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

This discussion reminds me that one time at 3AM at a tennis/club event (don't ask me why I was there) where the visitors outnumbered the population, my glucose levels were dangerously low and I encountered the only open sandwich shop in town, where I was sold a measly panino with nothing on it for the equivalent of about 15 dollars.

The Great Hippo wrote:Nuclear bombs are like potato chips, you can't stop after just *one*

somitomi
Posts: 756
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2015 11:21 pm UTC
Location: can be found in Hungary
Contact:

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Hiferator wrote:But yes, some phablets are ridiculous.

The word "phablet" itself is ridiculous. Which, along with the emergence of things that are both laptops and tablets is why someday I will come up with a shorthand for "portable computer" and will use it for everything from smartphones to laptops from that day.
orthogon wrote:talians would rarely have cause to refer to an individual spaghetto, whereas a panino is presumably a commonly ordered thing. But perhaps Italians never eat alone...

What, do Italians never take an individual spaghetto out of the pack to chew it while cooking the rest of their pasta?

―◯‐◯ FG Discord ◯‐◯―

yakkoTDI
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 4:02 pm UTC

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

somitomi wrote:
orthogon wrote:talians would rarely have cause to refer to an individual spaghetto, whereas a panino is presumably a commonly ordered thing. But perhaps Italians never eat alone...

What, do Italians never take an individual spaghetto out of the pack to chew it while cooking the rest of their pasta?

What kind of crazy person ever does this?

/me hides half chewed spaghetto

Kewangji
Has Been Touched
Posts: 2255
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:20 pm UTC
Location: Lost in Translation
Contact:

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

somitomi wrote:The word "phablet" itself is ridiculous. Which, along with the emergence of things that are both laptops and tablets is why someday I will come up with a shorthand for "portable computer" and will use it for everything from smartphones to laptops from that day.

French has "portable" for this, if I'm not mistaken.

The Great Hippo wrote:Nuclear bombs are like potato chips, you can't stop after just *one*

sonar1313
Posts: 183
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 5:29 am UTC

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

cheweytoo wrote:I'm not aware of any newly popular, smaller, pizza-replacing food item though…

That would be a calzone.

Either that or it's time for those frozen pizza roll-up things to make a comeback.

rmsgrey
Posts: 3655
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 6:35 pm UTC

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

orthogon wrote:This phenomenon seems to run counter to shrinkflation, which affects goods sold in shops, as opposed to restaurants. Perhaps because you notice the size whilst you're still in the restaurant?

A couple of examples of shrinkflation I've noticed particularly in the last year or two:

Toblerones with missing teeth.

Jaffa cakes have started appearing in packs of 10 rather than 12.

Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 4060
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

somitomi wrote:someday I will come up with a shorthand for "portable computer" and will use it for everything from smartphones to laptops from that day.

P.C.

da Doctah
Posts: 997
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 6:27 am UTC

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

orthogon wrote:
richP wrote:My graph-related OCD is going nuts... the graph rotation is off by ninety degrees. Time is the dependent variable gosh darn it!

I won't mention that panini is the plural, then. *twitch*

This phenomenon seems to run counter to shrinkflation, which affects goods sold in shops, as opposed to restaurants. Perhaps because you notice the size whilst you're still in the restaurant?

ETA Inb4: Yes, yes, panini is the plural in Italian, whilst in English, panini is singular. Descriptivism, etc. I just haven't let this one go yet. (I read an amusing column once, which said "'The spaghetti were delicious'? I don't think so.")

ETA2: Actually, spaghetti isn't as egregious, because it's Italian plural -> English mass noun, not Italian plural -> English singular. Italians would rarely have cause to refer to an individual spaghetto, whereas a panino is presumably a commonly ordered thing. But perhaps Italians never eat alone...

Just popping in here to point out that the singular of tamales is not, as usually thought, tamale. It's tamal. Get it right, hombres.

measure
Posts: 131
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2015 4:31 pm UTC
Location: Time-traveling kayak

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

somitomi wrote:
Hiferator wrote:But yes, some phablets are ridiculous.

The word "phablet" itself is ridiculous.

I can't not see "phallic tablet". Now neither can you. You're welcome.

Pfhorrest
Posts: 5487
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:11 am UTC
Contact:

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

"Mobile device" seems to be the catch-all for term for "portable computer" in Business English, and in British English "mobile" is already short for "mobile phone", so I vote we just start calling all mobile information and communication devices (including mobile phones, tablets, laptops, etc) "mobiles".

Or we could say "portutor". Your call.
Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of All Trades
"I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
The Codex Quaerendae (my philosophy) - The Chronicles of Quelouva (my fiction)

Steve the Pocket
Posts: 707
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 4:02 am UTC
Location: Going downtuuu in a Luleelurah!

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

"Too large to eat comfortably", and the illustration of a Dagwood accompanying it, is putting it mildly. More like, "so overstuffed that you can't even pick it up without half the ingredients spilling onto the plate." I got a chicken po' boy from Sheetz one time because I had a coupon, and I had to pick out about half the chicken with a fork before I was confident that I could handle it. The gyros from EuroGyro have issues too.

I never got involved with the Great Sandwich Debate of 2017, but my favorite "definition" of a sandwich was something like "anything I can pick up and eat with my bare hands while playing cards with my fellow nobles in the Hellfire Club." This means anything too big to pick up, even with two hands, or too soaked through to keep my hands clean, is disqualified.

I'll make an exception if you want to explicitly call something a "knife and fork sandwich", because at least you're being honest even if it's kind of cheating.
cephalopod9 wrote:Only on Xkcd can you start a topic involving Hitler and people spend the better part of half a dozen pages arguing about the quality of Operating Systems.

Baige.

Posts: 1406
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:11 pm UTC
Location: Oakland

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Steve the Pocket wrote:I'll make an exception if you want to explicitly call something a "knife and fork sandwich", because at least you're being honest even if it's kind of cheating.

or "Open Face Sandwich?"
Belial wrote:I am not even in the same country code as "the mood for this shit."

StClair
Posts: 409
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:07 am UTC

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

moody7277 wrote:
richP wrote:My graph-related OCD is going nuts... the graph rotation is off by ninety degrees. Time is the dependent variable gosh darn it!

Shame you're not an astronomer, they're used to axes going in weird directions.

Speaking of, am I the only one who looked at this and thought of the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram?

Eternal Density
Posts: 5590
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 12:37 am UTC
Contact:

### Re: 1940: "A hotdog is a taco"

RickLeePhoto wrote:Also applies to cars.

Hey, that's what I came here to say!
Play the game of Time! castle.chirpingmustard.com Hotdog Vending Supplier But what is this?
In the Marvel vs. DC film-making war, we're all winners.

pogrmman
Posts: 623
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:53 pm UTC
Location: Probably outside

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

StClair wrote:
moody7277 wrote:
richP wrote:My graph-related OCD is going nuts... the graph rotation is off by ninety degrees. Time is the dependent variable gosh darn it!

Shame you're not an astronomer, they're used to axes going in weird directions.

Speaking of, am I the only one who looked at this and thought of the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram?

You're not.

orthogon
Posts: 3103
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 7:52 am UTC
Location: The Airy 1830 ellipsoid

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

yakkoTDI wrote:
somitomi wrote:
orthogon wrote:talians would rarely have cause to refer to an individual spaghetto, whereas a panino is presumably a commonly ordered thing. But perhaps Italians never eat alone...

What, do Italians never take an individual spaghetto out of the pack to chew it while cooking the rest of their pasta?

What kind of crazy person ever does this?

/me hides half chewed spaghetto

I thought I was alone! Thing is, you do this when you're extremely hungry, and it's utterly unsatisfying. The dry pasta is just too hard, and unpleasantly so, rather than nicely crunchy. If you suck for long enough, the outside goes a bit soft and starchy whilst the inside remains hard. And it has no flavour. It's an act of desperation, like drinking seawater. And yet, I still do it.

(Is dry pasta even a thing in Italy?)
xtifr wrote:... and orthogon merely sounds undecided.

Posts: 84
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:58 pm UTC
Location: Somewhere in that country with Big Ben in it.

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

What about those giant bourbon biscuits and custard creams? I can't see them being popular. For once, I think the usual size will be the best. Wagon Wheels for one became smaller.

I'm not sure which cookies you have in the US.
For comic writing or short story writing post-haste, contact the off-the peg joke chap. He has the nous.
https://www.upwork.com/freelancers/~01110048bacb43eae6 to hire me at Upwork.

jpers36
Posts: 234
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:47 pm UTC
Location: The 3-manifold described by Red and Blue

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

I think someone's been reading The Innovator's Dilemma.

Wee Red Bird
Posts: 193
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:50 am UTC
Location: In a tree

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

Soupspoon wrote:
somitomi wrote:someday I will come up with a shorthand for "portable computer" and will use it for everything from smartphones to laptops from that day.

P.C.

"What's a computer?" - Annoying kid in an Apple advert shortly before being beaten to death with the keyboard attached to her iPad

GlassHouses
Posts: 201
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2016 12:41 pm UTC

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

RickLeePhoto wrote:Also applies to cars.

As in "Jay Leno owns several Ferrari" vs. "my dentist just bought a Ferraro"...

Speaking of cars, I used to own a 1980 VW Golf, the one that was sold as the Rabbit in the U.S., i.e. the first series. According to a Wikipedia, the basic model of that series weighed 790 kg, while the basic model of the current series (the seventh) weighs 1351 kg, a 71% increase. How much bigger will it have to get before they start to feel the need to introduce a new, smaller model in their lineup?

Eoink
Posts: 88
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:33 pm UTC

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

GlassHouses wrote:
RickLeePhoto wrote:Also applies to cars.

As in "Jay Leno owns several Ferrari" vs. "my dentist just bought a Ferraro"...

Speaking of cars, I used to own a 1980 VW Golf, the one that was sold as the Rabbit in the U.S., i.e. the first series. According to a Wikipedia, the basic model of that series weighed 790 kg, while the basic model of the current series (the seventh) weighs 1351 kg, a 71% increase. How much bigger will it have to get before they start to feel the need to introduce a new, smaller model in their lineup?

If my quick Google is accurate, the VW Polo now weighs >1,000kg, so the model down is already larger than your early Golf. Indeed even the Up starts at >900kg, I wonder if a lot of that is down to safety measures.

Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 4060
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

GlassHouses wrote:Speaking of cars, I used to own a 1980 VW Golf, the one that was sold as the Rabbit in the U.S., i.e. the first series. According to a Wikipedia, the basic model of that series weighed 790 kg, while the basic model of the current series (the seventh) weighs 1351 kg, a 71% increase. How much bigger will it have to get before they start to feel the need to introduce a new, smaller model in their lineup?

Mini, classic and new…
Spoiler:

orthogon
Posts: 3103
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 7:52 am UTC
Location: The Airy 1830 ellipsoid

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

jpers36 wrote:I think someone's been reading The Innovator's Dilemma.

I can kind of see the point, but that chart really fails to make it. The solid blue and green arrows are parallel, so on the face of it the "Disruptive Offering" is always going to be worse than the "Established Offering". In practice the latter will probably plateau, allowing the former to overtake it, but the chart doesn't show that. Also, "by Conventionally Measure"?

GlassHouses wrote:
RickLeePhoto wrote:Also applies to cars.

According to a Wikipedia, the basic model of that series weighed 790 kg, while the basic model of the current [VW Golf]series (the seventh) weighs 1351 kg, a 71% increase. How much bigger will it have to get before they start to feel the need to introduce a new, smaller model in their lineup?

There's definitely size inflation, but AIUI a lot of the weight increase in cars, particularly since the VW Beatle/Mini Cooper/2CV days is down to things like Side Impact Protection, which was introduced in the 80s/90s. It's basically metal armour, and has a weight to match. Safety features take all the fun out of motoring...
xtifr wrote:... and orthogon merely sounds undecided.

jpers36
Posts: 234
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:47 pm UTC
Location: The 3-manifold described by Red and Blue

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

orthogon wrote:
jpers36 wrote:I think someone's been reading The Innovator's Dilemma.

I can kind of see the point, but that chart really fails to make it. The solid blue and green arrows are parallel, so on the face of it the "Disruptive Offering" is always going to be worse than the "Established Offering". In practice the latter will probably plateau, allowing the former to overtake it, but the chart doesn't show that. Also, "by Conventionally Measure"?

Ignore the chart flaws, I did a quick image search.

The disruptive offering is always going to be less functional by old standards than the established offering, but that will be offset by the disruptive offering being both less costly and usable in unforeseen ways. This brings a new market for the technology type. As the functionality of both offerings increase, the marginal utility of the established offering offers less actual value than the alternative benefits of the disruptive offering.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Innovator%27s_Dilemma

richP
Posts: 195
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 3:28 pm UTC

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

somitomi wrote:The word "phablet" itself is ridiculous. Which, along with the emergence of things that are both laptops and tablets is why someday I will come up with a shorthand for "portable computer" and will use it for everything from smartphones to laptops from that day.

computini?
computo?
Sorry, I'm still stuck on the panini discussion, I guess...

GlassHouses
Posts: 201
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2016 12:41 pm UTC

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

orthogon wrote:
GlassHouses wrote:
RickLeePhoto wrote:Also applies to cars.

According to a Wikipedia, the basic model of that series weighed 790 kg, while the basic model of the current [VW Golf]series (the seventh) weighs 1351 kg, a 71% increase. How much bigger will it have to get before they start to feel the need to introduce a new, smaller model in their lineup?

There's definitely size inflation, but AIUI a lot of the weight increase in cars, particularly since the VW Beatle/Mini Cooper/2CV days is down to things like Side Impact Protection, which was introduced in the 80s/90s. It's basically metal armour, and has a weight to match. Safety features take all the fun out of motoring...

The side impact protection and airbags and whatnot must have made a difference, but I'm not sure it's a significant factor compared to the overall size inflation.
Wikipedia only provides weight information for four out of the seven Golf series, but the resulting graph (of the low-end models vs. year of initial release) looks remarkably straight:

Cougar Allen
Posts: 70
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 4:49 am UTC

### Re: 1940: "The Food Size Cycle"

cheweytoo wrote:This inflation certainly seems to apply to pizza sizes around here:
A "large pizza" is now routinely bigger than the plate it is being served on.
I'm not aware of any newly popular, smaller, pizza-replacing food item though…

They sell pizza by the slice nowadays.