Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Rot your brains, then rot our boards

Moderators: SecondTalon, Moderators General, Prelates

rmsgrey
Posts: 3477
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 6:35 pm UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby rmsgrey » Fri Feb 09, 2018 11:09 pm UTC

Zohar wrote:As you said, it's not a past relationship, so I think this situation is different. And BTW speising, just because it's a comedy doesn't mean we should expect less from the characters.

Anyway, I haven't seen a ton yet, probably less than ten episodes, but I don't recall him complaining too much about his wife. Might be more later.


Frasier and Lilith get on reasonably well - it's the other characters who have a problem with her. Yes, he mentions their break-up in the first episode (as a way of resolving their relationship from Cheers) but they're at least cordial in person he's generally got other things on his mind when she's not in town. It's Niles who keeps talking about his (current) wife (who gets mentioned in practically every episode of the first few seasons, but never appears).

User avatar
Ginger
Posts: 1029
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 10:00 am UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby Ginger » Sat Feb 10, 2018 12:50 am UTC

Actually, he talked about it more than once, and I've seen over ten episodes. Anyways, just once is enough, and they so distant they might as well be exes. So I don't see why you all hate on my emotions about a comedy show about a bad inappropriate therapist so much? And Niles whine like a barking male dog about Maris.
Amy Lee wrote:Just what we all need... more lies about a world that never was and never will be.


Azula to Long Feng wrote:Don't flatter yourself, you were never even a player.

User avatar
Zohar
COMMANDER PORN
Posts: 8287
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:45 pm UTC
Location: Denver

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby Zohar » Sun Feb 11, 2018 2:05 am UTC

We are not "hating on your emotions", we just think differently than you do?
Mighty Jalapeno: "See, Zohar agrees, and he's nice to people."
SecondTalon: "Still better looking than Jesus."

Not how I say my name

User avatar
Ginger
Posts: 1029
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 10:00 am UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby Ginger » Sun Feb 11, 2018 4:29 am UTC

Zohar wrote:We are not "hating on your emotions", we just think differently than you do?

That's fine sorry if I came off as abrasive in any way. Anyways, I saw the show in the nineties or whatever? So? I may not be remembering everything correctly. I am pretty sure however that he mentions Lilith more than once and not in a good light? Could be mistaken though anyways thanks for reading bye bye. :)
Amy Lee wrote:Just what we all need... more lies about a world that never was and never will be.


Azula to Long Feng wrote:Don't flatter yourself, you were never even a player.

User avatar
plytho
¡This cheese is burning me!
Posts: 169
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 6:23 pm UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby plytho » Tue Mar 27, 2018 8:32 am UTC

I've started watching timeless and I'm really enjoying it. It's about three people (white guy, black guy, white girl) traveling through time to stop the bad guy from changing American history. It really reminds me of sliders. It makes no sense if you think about it, so don't think about it too much and enjoy the antics.
Pronouns: he him his
Avatar: The High Frontier by Angus McKie

User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 3723
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby Soupspoon » Fri Mar 30, 2018 1:08 am UTC

plytho wrote:I've started watching timeless and I'm really enjoying it. It's about three people (white guy, black guy, white girl) traveling through time to stop the bad guy from changing American history. It really reminds me of sliders. It makes no sense if you think about it, so don't think about it too much and enjoy the antics.

I've seen a few of the episodes (I think it was on Channel 4, over here, a year ago, but I didn't watch much regular TV at the time) and it seems to sort of follow its own time-travel consistency, of the 'interfere and rebranch' chronological-tree type (without Marty McFlying the time-travellers themselves, just A Sound Of Thundering things upon their 'return'). The whole journal/whatever and cabalistic power-group/Alias-like artefact trail is arguably more of a stretch, but I hadn't spotted too much in the first few episodes that went beyond an expected degree of disbelief levitation for the premise.

A comparison with Quantum Leap could also be made, except doing their own self-contained Al/Ziggy/Gooshie stuff alongside being the Sam. With…
Spoiler:
…who actually is/are the Sam and who is/are the Evil Leaper being a bone of contention…
…raised within the handful of episodes I saw.

User avatar
cephalopod9
Posts: 2015
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 7:23 am UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby cephalopod9 » Sat Mar 31, 2018 12:58 pm UTC

I caught most of an episode, and it looks fun, but I'm over saturated in moving pictures content.

The thing that tends bother me about time travel plots is how often characters are rushing to accomplish something that shouldn't matter how long it takes to do because there's time travel. Of the things I've watched, Steins Gate probably frustrated me the most, and Primer was an over correction.

Another thing that's real weird about time travel movies is that there were two different movies where Rachel McAdams was romantically pursued by a dude with time travel powers, and the dude's actions are played as cute and sentimental, but it's pretty troubling if you think about it.

User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 3723
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby Soupspoon » Sat Mar 31, 2018 2:55 pm UTC

The urgency of time-travellers can be dealt with several ways. I think (IIRC) this time it's that they have to 'chase' the others as soon as they know where/when to chase them, then have a scenario in the past to play through in real-time with a localised deadline (not helped by not being able to land five weeks in advance and just ambush the others when they arrive, even if that's possible, due to uncertainty).

Other methods include Seven Days's premise of only having seven days of rewind (then returning the 'normal' way, except now with the seven-days-waiting ship/pilot, including fuel 'used' not existing, and supposedly no way of multi-leaping back to give more preparation time at either end of the mission). Then there's "time spent in past running linear with time waiting in the future", with or without obvious 'timequake' revisions of events outside/inside Time Travel Agency HQ as the historic away-team nudges causality about, and that's with or without a continued wormhole for communication or even passing objects back and forth.

The Whovian universe goes all Timey-Wimey about it. Some things always happen, some things can change, but (apart from when specifically avoided, for Plot) you have the Blinovitch Limitation effect and/or paradox-protection modules in all Tardii and related equipment to prevent casually revisiting a personal timeline (though you can benefit/otherwise from your own future actions in the universal past!) and causing Problems (chronovores being just one instantiation).

Though, really, Who is soft-science as far as time-travel is concerned. Most of the other memorable versions either made sure they were consistent or never got so venerable in their popularity that they had writers entirely missing the point about the lore built up along the way. (Also, this Who universe is at least one entirely new version of the old 'remembered' universe, as of the Pandorica episode, never mind the mostly off-screen Time War remoulding things and personal timeline issues arising from Trenzalore, so consistency with its past self should probably be regarded more extraordinary than the inconsistencies.)

rmsgrey
Posts: 3477
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 6:35 pm UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby rmsgrey » Sat Mar 31, 2018 2:57 pm UTC

cephalopod9 wrote:The thing that tends bother me about time travel plots is how often characters are rushing to accomplish something that shouldn't matter how long it takes to do because there's time travel.


Yeah, the standard fictional model of time is that, even if there's not full San Dimas Time (in Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure, time travel is quantised in days, expressed as "the clock is always running in San Dimas"), there's still a ripple effect where, rather than the timeline changing instantly the moment someone steps into a time machine to go into the past, there's a delay before the timeline catches up - someone can wave goodbye to the time traveler, and continue to exist normally unchanged for minutes, hours, or possibly even days, before ceasing to exist as the timeline changes. This may imply the existence of some sort of meta-time - a time that elapses for an observer external to normal time, in which the changes can be observed to ripple forward - or it might be that it can be made to make sense without any second-order time. Either way, there's some sort of inertia to history, meaning that changes don't happen immediately - and you have a limited window in which to reverse them before the new status quo establishes itself, and you no longer existed to make sure your parents get together after all.

The problem is that thinking about time travel without thinking in terms of some sort of meta-time to provide a "before" and "after" is very unintuitive, so, even people trained in that sort of reasoning have trouble with it. The average writer (even of SF) isn't trained in temporal logic, so tends to just go with what feels right rather than reasoning everything out.

User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 3723
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby Soupspoon » Sat Mar 31, 2018 3:14 pm UTC

(I realise you probably wrote that as I was writing mine. If only one or other of us could go back in time... ;))

rmsgrey wrote:and you no longer existed to make sure your parents get together after all.

Stupidest part of BttF. Rest of it "makes sense", but a time traveller inserted into their own (pre)history should either exist (where they land) or not exist (because they never came back in this branch). Fading away, as a handy guage at how much you're failing to still exist (yet still giving enough existence to decide to do something that will 'unfade' you).

Future-changes back at HQ, as observed, can be explained by the camera crossing between original and (perhaps several) subsequent interfered-with timelines, to witness what branch of the future is currently active given the actions of the traveller. Unless people notice them happening.

(Then you need to say that HQ, with the chronomatrix-launchpad-thingummy at its heart, is perhaps enveloped inside a Continuity field. That must apply to the guys at the Project Quantum Leap desert base, perhaps related to the aurora effects that Al sees during that first unscheduled Leap activation, and must make Al's decades of marriage ('previously' cut short to him being MIA and his wife assuming him dead) confusing, if he can't resolve pre- and post-leap continuities in his own head, never mind the other things that seem to go our way (the timeline as we remember it), to the pleasure of the team, whereas previously they can only have known of it differently.)

rmsgrey
Posts: 3477
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 6:35 pm UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby rmsgrey » Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:41 am UTC

Soupspoon wrote:(Then you need to say that HQ, with the chronomatrix-launchpad-thingummy at its heart, is perhaps enveloped inside a Continuity field. That must apply to the guys at the Project Quantum Leap desert base, perhaps related to the aurora effects that Al sees during that first unscheduled Leap activation, and must make Al's decades of marriage ('previously' cut short to him being MIA and his wife assuming him dead) confusing, if he can't resolve pre- and post-leap continuities in his own head, never mind the other things that seem to go our way (the timeline as we remember it), to the pleasure of the team, whereas previously they can only have known of it differently.)


I forget whether it was explained on the show (it's about 5 years since I rewatched the series) but I know one of the spin-off novels explicitly stated that, because Ziggy is grown from neural cells taken from both Sam and Al (which is also what enables Al to serve as Observer), Ziggy is aware of the changes in history around her, and while Al's in the Imaging Chamber, he's isolated from time changes too - so whenever he comes off shift, Ziggy briefs him on who he's currently dating and any other shifts in interpersonal relations among the project staff that he should be aware of.

For a show strongly linked to Bellisario's Maxim ("Don't examine this too closely"), Quantum Leap does surprisingly well at maintaining philosophical consistency (even if the physics is a bit caca). Under their model, time can be changed, but the time-traveler, existing in the new timeline before the change, isn't affected, though his original time will be - and anything linked with the time-traveler across time is also protected - Ziggy, Al when inside the Imaging Chamber, and, presumably, the Leapee. Though there was that one episode where, once young Al's chances of survival dropped to 0, Al got replaced as Observer in mid sentence, and didn't reappear until Sam changed history far enough to give him a chance of survival after all...

User avatar
cephalopod9
Posts: 2015
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 7:23 am UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby cephalopod9 » Wed Apr 04, 2018 10:14 am UTC

Soupspoon wrote:Stupidest part of BttF. Rest of it "makes sense", but a time traveller inserted into their own (pre)history should either exist (where they land) or not exist (because they never came back in this branch). Fading away, as a handy guage at how much you're failing to still exist (yet still giving enough existence to decide to do something that will 'unfade' you).

I have to disagree you there,
the dumbest part of Back to the Future is claiming no one can predict a lightning strike.
Soupspoon wrote:Future-changes back at HQ, as observed, can be explained by the camera crossing between original and (perhaps several) subsequent interfered-with timelines, to witness what branch of the future is currently active given the actions of the traveller. Unless people notice them happening.
the audience as subject to the influences of time shifts is a real wild idea.
Applying a strict logic memories, even those of the time traveler, shouldn't be exempt from changes to the time line. That's a lot to think through, and including the audience in that framework is even more ambitious.
... it's weird that I can't think of any terminology that specifies when a show has content that is dreamed or imagined by a character. That kind of seems significant, like the difference between 1st and 3rd person narrative in text.

Anthology movies should be more of a thing. There was some buzz going around about a potential Lord of the Rings streaming/tv series, and while tv/streaming adaptations have been incomprehensibly good in places, I'd so much rather have a Middle Earth anthology with a bunch of 3 to 20 minute clips from a bunch of directors of whatever they think is interesting.


aw dang it, I was the last one to post here and i feel obligated to edit and not double post.

anyway, i'm gettin' over a flu bug and have some low-grade rebound insomnia, and
I'm stuck thinking about this small segment on Last Week Tonight which featured a sort of viral clip of an Info Wars hack trying to get a reaction from a young woman wearing an anime school girl outfit, but John Oliver calls her basically "sassy Pop-eye". It's just real weird to me that was the immediate point of reference. Does John Oliver not know it's an anime thing? Does Last Week Tonight assume it's audience won't appreciate references to anime?
It's also just real weird that Japanese school uniforms were modeled after British naval uniforms, and that action cartoons have popularized that among American nerd people.
I can't come up with a better punchline, but Donald Duck's sailor suit is closer to the anime costume than what Pop-eye wears.
What reads as "a sailor suit"?

User avatar
Angua
Don't call her Delphine.
Posts: 5825
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:42 pm UTC
Location: UK/[St. Kitts and] Nevis Occasionally, I migrate to the US for a bit

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby Angua » Sat May 26, 2018 4:13 pm UTC

Solo doesn't have it's own thread, so here we go:
Spoiler:
I'm really upset by what they do to L3. She was so against droid enslavement, and then they upload her consciousness into the Falcon and never speak to her again???? You could argue that it was just the maps but they way they say she's calculating the route out makes it sound like she's still in there somewhere??? I can't imagine a worse fate for her.

Also, so confused why Chewbacca was being used as a beast? 1) Chewie can clearly understand non-Wookie so Han speaking Wookie shouldn't have had that much of an impact. 2) Chewie could have done that escape by himself. 3) It makes no sense that Chewie would have been used that way - there are plenty of non-sapient beasts around and the other Wookies were clearly valuable as slave-labour. The whole situation just made no sense on so many levels.
Crabtree's bludgeon: “no set of mutually inconsistent observations can exist for which some human intellect cannot conceive a coherent explanation, however complicated”
GNU Terry Pratchett

User avatar
poxic
Eloquently Prismatic
Posts: 4716
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:28 am UTC
Location: Left coast of Canada

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby poxic » Sat May 26, 2018 6:34 pm UTC

I gather that consistency is not a big concern for the current owners of the franchise. Story, tone, characterisation, anything.
All empires fall.
Don't look back.
- The Secret Knots

User avatar
Liri
Healthy non-floating pooper reporting for doodie.
Posts: 1113
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 8:11 pm UTC
Contact:

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby Liri » Tue May 29, 2018 12:42 pm UTC

I skimmed a review, avoiding the spoilery bits, but I did glimpse where his last name comes from. That is so stupid.
There's a certain amount of freedom involved in cycling: you're self-propelled and decide exactly where to go. If you see something that catches your eye to the left, you can veer off there, which isn't so easy in a car, and you can't cover as much ground walking.

User avatar
cephalopod9
Posts: 2015
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 7:23 am UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby cephalopod9 » Mon Jun 04, 2018 9:22 am UTC

Liri wrote:I skimmed a review, avoiding the spoilery bits, but I did glimpse where his last name comes from. That is so stupid.

...do you know of, or can you imagine any possible explanations for the name of any character in all of the entirety of Star Wars that aren't very stupid?

The main character of the first movies is named Luke because it phonetically the first syllable of Lucas.

I've been watching youtubes about dinosaurs, and why hasn't James Cameron made a dinosaur movie? Jurassic Park really has a monopoly, and locked us into the Scary Monster movie format. Just make a chill people with dinosaurs movie. There was a made for t.v. Dinotopia adaptation, and like a gag in a Will Ferrel movie?
It seems like there's a number of movies with space creatures, or like dragons and dire wolves. I'm just kind of disappointed "dinosaurs" as a movie concept have just gotten more monster-y and more scary, and no one has tried to make a high or mid budget movie with dinosaurs as mostly realistic animals.

User avatar
Liri
Healthy non-floating pooper reporting for doodie.
Posts: 1113
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 8:11 pm UTC
Contact:

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby Liri » Mon Jun 04, 2018 11:42 am UTC

cephalopod9 wrote:
Liri wrote:I skimmed a review, avoiding the spoilery bits, but I did glimpse where his last name comes from. That is so stupid.

...do you know of, or can you imagine any possible explanations for the name of any character in all of the entirety of Star Wars that aren't very stupid?

I'm clearly talking in-universe, here. I don't give a whit for what the real-life explanation is. The EU Legends story is that Solo was a Corellian royal family. I'm cool with that. The point being, names were just names and they didn't need an explanation in the first place.
There's a certain amount of freedom involved in cycling: you're self-propelled and decide exactly where to go. If you see something that catches your eye to the left, you can veer off there, which isn't so easy in a car, and you can't cover as much ground walking.

commodorejohn
Posts: 1130
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:21 pm UTC
Location: Placerville, CA
Contact:

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby commodorejohn » Mon Jun 04, 2018 5:26 pm UTC

Liri wrote:The point being, names were just names and they didn't need an explanation in the first place.

But if they stopped answering questions nobody asked, how would they ever get a movie out of it?
"'Legacy code' often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling."
- Bjarne Stroustrup
www.commodorejohn.com - in case you were wondering, which you probably weren't.

rmsgrey
Posts: 3477
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 6:35 pm UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby rmsgrey » Mon Jun 04, 2018 11:26 pm UTC

commodorejohn wrote:
Liri wrote:The point being, names were just names and they didn't need an explanation in the first place.

But if they stopped answering questions nobody asked, how would they ever get a movie out of it?

Hey! I've just had a great idea for a movie!

User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 3723
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby Soupspoon » Mon Jun 04, 2018 11:42 pm UTC

rmsgrey wrote:
commodorejohn wrote:
Liri wrote:The point being, names were just names and they didn't need an explanation in the first place.

But if they stopped answering questions nobody asked, how would they ever get a movie out of it?

Hey! I've just had a great idea for a movie!

It's "Hamm: A Toy Story Story", isn't it? Please tell me it's that!

Tyndmyr
Posts: 11443
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:38 pm UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby Tyndmyr » Tue Jun 05, 2018 2:23 pm UTC

Liri wrote:
cephalopod9 wrote:
Liri wrote:I skimmed a review, avoiding the spoilery bits, but I did glimpse where his last name comes from. That is so stupid.

...do you know of, or can you imagine any possible explanations for the name of any character in all of the entirety of Star Wars that aren't very stupid?

I'm clearly talking in-universe, here. I don't give a whit for what the real-life explanation is. The EU Legends story is that Solo was a Corellian royal family. I'm cool with that. The point being, names were just names and they didn't need an explanation in the first place.


Yeah, it really did feel like they wanted to explain absolutely everything about him in one fairly brief stretch. That particular bit felt rather forced, but then...pretty much the entire movie did.

Edit: I suppose we also didn't need an origin story for why Solo shortens Chewbacca to Chewy, but...we got one.

User avatar
trpmb6
Posts: 425
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 6:27 pm UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby trpmb6 » Fri Jun 15, 2018 1:27 pm UTC

cephalopod9 wrote:
I've been watching youtubes about dinosaurs, and why hasn't James Cameron made a dinosaur movie? Jurassic Park really has a monopoly, and locked us into the Scary Monster movie format. Just make a chill people with dinosaurs movie. There was a made for t.v. Dinotopia adaptation, and like a gag in a Will Ferrel movie?
It seems like there's a number of movies with space creatures, or like dragons and dire wolves. I'm just kind of disappointed "dinosaurs" as a movie concept have just gotten more monster-y and more scary, and no one has tried to make a high or mid budget movie with dinosaurs as mostly realistic animals.


As cool as dinosaurs are, I don't think anyone would go watch a movie about various herbivore dinosaurs walking along chomping on trees. The movies that exist do so because that is what the audience wants to see. Humans are inherently intrigued by violence. I don't think anyone would go watch a movie about Frodo frolicking around in the shire, smoking his peace pipe every day.
(terran/protoss/zerg/fascist fuck)

Tyndmyr
Posts: 11443
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:38 pm UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby Tyndmyr » Fri Jun 15, 2018 3:17 pm UTC

trpmb6 wrote:As cool as dinosaurs are, I don't think anyone would go watch a movie about various herbivore dinosaurs walking along chomping on trees. The movies that exist do so because that is what the audience wants to see. Humans are inherently intrigued by violence. I don't think anyone would go watch a movie about Frodo frolicking around in the shire, smoking his peace pipe every day.


Eh, that's basically what The Good Dinosaur was.

Granted, it WAS Pixar's lowest grossing film to date.

User avatar
trpmb6
Posts: 425
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 6:27 pm UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby trpmb6 » Fri Jun 15, 2018 3:19 pm UTC

Tyndmyr wrote:Eh, that's basically what The Good Dinosaur was.

Granted, it WAS Pixar's lowest grossing film to date.


We have the good dinosaur. I think we got it for free from someone who learned our kids (age 3.5 and 1.5) liked dinosaurs.

Our kids hate that movie. They'd rather sit in silence in a car for 9 hours than watch that movie. (I'm slightly exaggerating there but not that much in truth..)
(terran/protoss/zerg/fascist fuck)

Tyndmyr
Posts: 11443
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:38 pm UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby Tyndmyr » Fri Jun 15, 2018 3:30 pm UTC

Yeah, the reception sort of makes your point, I suppose.

That said, I see where ceph's coming from. The original Jurassic Park was great, but much of the horror stemmed from the dinosaurs straight up treating us as prey, not from over-reliance on traditional horror movie tropes. The trailer for the new one, it looks like the big bad is much more interested in being scary than in just eating you. It's a very different vibe.

User avatar
cephalopod9
Posts: 2015
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 7:23 am UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby cephalopod9 » Fri Jun 15, 2018 10:38 pm UTC

trpmb6 wrote:As cool as dinosaurs are, I don't think anyone would go watch a movie about various herbivore dinosaurs walking along chomping on trees. The movies that exist do so because that is what the audience wants to see.

There's well over 5 thousand titles on IMBD with the key word "horse" currently. I'm pretty sure people aren't anti-herbivore in their entertainment.
The plot of Jurassic Park isn't "a bunch of meat eaters walking along" it's about people and their hubris, and bad decisions. As the franchise goes on it's increasingly "argh! a dinosaurs that can eat people! ragh!", but there's still character arcs and conflicts that make up the actual plot.
Dinosaurs would be cool as background, or world building, and like, any story with a big animal or even wilderness as a central element could be made with prehistoric animals. Like one of James Cameron's Avatar sequels could be on a planet where the wild life just happens to be recognizable to the dinosaur nerds in the audience.
Lastly, the tranquility of plant eaters is greatly overstated.

User avatar
trpmb6
Posts: 425
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 6:27 pm UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby trpmb6 » Sat Jun 16, 2018 5:36 pm UTC

cephalopod9 wrote:
trpmb6 wrote:As cool as dinosaurs are, I don't think anyone would go watch a movie about various herbivore dinosaurs walking along chomping on trees. The movies that exist do so because that is what the audience wants to see.

There's well over 5 thousand titles on IMBD with the key word "horse" currently. I'm pretty sure people aren't anti-herbivore in their entertainment.
The plot of Jurassic Park isn't "a bunch of meat eaters walking along" it's about people and their hubris, and bad decisions. As the franchise goes on it's increasingly "argh! a dinosaurs that can eat people! ragh!", but there's still character arcs and conflicts that make up the actual plot.
Dinosaurs would be cool as background, or world building, and like, any story with a big animal or even wilderness as a central element could be made with prehistoric animals. Like one of James Cameron's Avatar sequels could be on a planet where the wild life just happens to be recognizable to the dinosaur nerds in the audience.
Lastly, the tranquility of plant eaters is greatly overstated.



I would pay to see a movie where humans tamed dinos and rode them like horses.
(terran/protoss/zerg/fascist fuck)

User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 3723
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby Soupspoon » Sat Jun 16, 2018 6:01 pm UTC

trpmb6 wrote:I would pay to see a movie where humans tamed dinos and rode them like horses.
Something or other from http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DomesticatedDinosaurs?

commodorejohn
Posts: 1130
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:21 pm UTC
Location: Placerville, CA
Contact:

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby commodorejohn » Sun Jun 17, 2018 12:57 am UTC

trpmb6 wrote:I would pay to see a movie where humans tamed dinos and rode them like horses.

Sounds like a gay old time to me!
"'Legacy code' often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling."
- Bjarne Stroustrup
www.commodorejohn.com - in case you were wondering, which you probably weren't.

User avatar
Angua
Don't call her Delphine.
Posts: 5825
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:42 pm UTC
Location: UK/[St. Kitts and] Nevis Occasionally, I migrate to the US for a bit

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby Angua » Sun Jun 17, 2018 8:01 am UTC

I do agree that an IMAX version of Dinotopia would be glorious. Maybe I should check out the liveaction movie - apparently there are 20 books now? I only had the first two.
Crabtree's bludgeon: “no set of mutually inconsistent observations can exist for which some human intellect cannot conceive a coherent explanation, however complicated”
GNU Terry Pratchett

User avatar
cephalopod9
Posts: 2015
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 7:23 am UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby cephalopod9 » Mon Jun 18, 2018 8:26 am UTC

Angua wrote:I do agree that an IMAX version of Dinotopia would be glorious. Maybe I should check out the liveaction movie - apparently there are 20 books now? I only had the first two.

I only sort of remember the t.v. mini-series. It was not good; kinda fun that they tried, and it's probably interesting to see how it's aged over 16 years, but still, 2002 and made for t.v.

What is good: James Gurney's youtube channel (the channel is about his art process, and that's a video where he paints dinosaurs.)

Soupspoon wrote:
trpmb6 wrote:I would pay to see a movie where humans tamed dinos and rode them like horses.
Something or other from http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DomesticatedDinosaurs?
see, the Live Action Film tab only has 4 entries that aren't JP, and they seem to all be forgettable B movies.

Mutex
Posts: 1388
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:32 pm UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby Mutex » Mon Jun 25, 2018 7:19 pm UTC

I wondered today why all of Quentin Tarantino's films are violent. Nothing against violent films at all, but, it seems weird to me that literally all of his films are violent. Seriously: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000233/?ref_=nv_sr_1 (I'm talking about ones he's written, and ignoring shorts like that Leonard Cohen music video.) Even that Star Trek film he's working on, if it happens, will be the first R rated Star Trek film. He's a talented film maker, and writer, so he's not relying on shock value, so it seems weird to me he hasn't made a single non-violent film. Obviously it's what he likes, but still. You'd think he'd have got bored.

User avatar
poxic
Eloquently Prismatic
Posts: 4716
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:28 am UTC
Location: Left coast of Canada

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby poxic » Mon Jun 25, 2018 7:31 pm UTC

He probably thinks it's deep. Alternately, he thinks it sells tickets.
All empires fall.
Don't look back.
- The Secret Knots

Mutex
Posts: 1388
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:32 pm UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby Mutex » Mon Jun 25, 2018 7:35 pm UTC

I guess at this point it's his brand. People going to a Tarantino movie expect violence.

Tyndmyr
Posts: 11443
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:38 pm UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby Tyndmyr » Mon Jun 25, 2018 8:12 pm UTC

Mutex wrote:I wondered today why all of Quentin Tarantino's films are violent. Nothing against violent films at all, but, it seems weird to me that literally all of his films are violent. Seriously: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000233/?ref_=nv_sr_1 (I'm talking about ones he's written, and ignoring shorts like that Leonard Cohen music video.) Even that Star Trek film he's working on, if it happens, will be the first R rated Star Trek film. He's a talented film maker, and writer, so he's not relying on shock value, so it seems weird to me he hasn't made a single non-violent film. Obviously it's what he likes, but still. You'd think he'd have got bored.


Directors largely have a very strong type. Violence is definitely part of his cinematic language.

The same is true of, say, Wes Anderson. I'm sure both of them *could* do something other than what they prefer, but they have money and clout, so why?

User avatar
Grop
Posts: 1973
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:36 am UTC
Location: France

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby Grop » Mon Jun 25, 2018 9:02 pm UTC

Death Proof was (I think) less violent than other movies of his, and it was a commercial failure.

Also I like the idea that strongish authors do whatever they want, instead of the same old thing that is dictated by big companies.

speising
Posts: 2288
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:54 pm UTC
Location: wien

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby speising » Mon Jun 25, 2018 10:14 pm UTC

Grop wrote:Death Proof was (I think) less violent than other movies of his, and it was a commercial failure.

Also I like the idea that strongish authors do whatever they want, instead of the same old thing that is dictated by big companies.

did you *see* Death Proof? i like QT's movies, but the ending of that one, or rather, the eruption of laughter in the audience that accompanied it, actually shocked me.

Mutex
Posts: 1388
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:32 pm UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby Mutex » Tue Jun 26, 2018 12:09 pm UTC

I know he's in a position to do whatever he wants, I meant I'm surprised he hasn't wanted to make a single non-violent film.

User avatar
trpmb6
Posts: 425
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 6:27 pm UTC

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby trpmb6 » Tue Jun 26, 2018 7:18 pm UTC

I prefer Tim Burton's whimsical over Quentin Tarantino's style - not even sure what to call his style to be honest.
(terran/protoss/zerg/fascist fuck)

User avatar
Angua
Don't call her Delphine.
Posts: 5825
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:42 pm UTC
Location: UK/[St. Kitts and] Nevis Occasionally, I migrate to the US for a bit

Re: Fleeting Thoughts: Movie and TV Shows

Postby Angua » Tue Jun 26, 2018 7:26 pm UTC

Only 3 episodes into Luke Cage Season 2, and can't shake the feeling that they've slowed down all the Caribbean people talking to make them easier to understand.
Crabtree's bludgeon: “no set of mutually inconsistent observations can exist for which some human intellect cannot conceive a coherent explanation, however complicated”
GNU Terry Pratchett


Return to “Movies and TV Shows”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: pkcommando and 11 guests