2042: "Rolle's Theorem"

This forum is for the individual discussion thread that goes with each new comic.

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

User avatar
ucim
Posts: 6568
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 3:23 pm UTC
Location: The One True Thread

Re: 2042: "Rolle's Theorem"

Postby ucim » Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:02 pm UTC

sonar1313 wrote:There are countless rules of composition for painters, poets, architects, and other artists, by which we can objectively judge the quality
But are those rules "objectively correct rules for judging art"? Different rules yield different results - the rules that have been found useful are still non-objective.

sonar1313 wrote: Enriching humanity matters. Humanity would certainly be impoverished if, in something I called performance art, I burned the Mona Lisa in front of a shocked and horrified audience.
What if it were the original painter of the Mona Lisa that destroyed it as performance art? (Ignoring the ghostly pre-requisites)

Jose
Order of the Sillies, Honoris Causam - bestowed by charlie_grumbles on NP 859 * OTTscar winner: Wordsmith - bestowed by yappobiscuts and the OTT on NP 1832 * Ecclesiastical Calendar of the Order of the Holy Contradiction * Please help addams if you can. She needs all of us.

sonar1313
Posts: 172
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 5:29 am UTC

Re: 2042: "Rolle's Theorem"

Postby sonar1313 » Tue Sep 25, 2018 1:19 pm UTC

ucim wrote:
sonar1313 wrote:There are countless rules of composition for painters, poets, architects, and other artists, by which we can objectively judge the quality
But are those rules "objectively correct rules for judging art"? Different rules yield different results - the rules that have been found useful are still non-objective.

sonar1313 wrote: Enriching humanity matters. Humanity would certainly be impoverished if, in something I called performance art, I burned the Mona Lisa in front of a shocked and horrified audience.
What if it were the original painter of the Mona Lisa that destroyed it as performance art? (Ignoring the ghostly pre-requisites)

Jose

Whether anyone likes the rules or not is up to them, I suppose, but there are plenty of rules that exist. If you don't follow the rules of meter, your poems become pretty terrible. If you use classical elements in architecture and don't follow the rules, your building ends up pretty ugly. There are rules of composition for painting and photography. Are they objectively correct? They certainly have stood the test of time, and the art that has stood the test of time generally follows them.

Botticelli was a follower of Savonarola and is known to have destroyed a number of his paintings at his behest, and humanity has regretted it ever since. Whether Botticelli had called that destruction "art" or not is pretty irrelevant - and had he done so, his contemporaries would probably have judged him to be insane. The Mona Lisa would never have gained the fame that it has now, but how famous might the lost Botticellis have been?

User avatar
Euphonium
Posts: 162
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 11:17 pm UTC
Location: in ur bourgeois bosses' union, agitating ur workers

Re: 2042: "Rolle's Theorem"

Postby Euphonium » Tue Sep 25, 2018 4:14 pm UTC

sonar1313 wrote:If you don't follow the rules of meter, your poems become pretty terrible. If you use classical elements in architecture and don't follow the rules, your building ends up pretty ugly.


Alternatively, if you're particularly brilliant about how you ignore the rules, your creations become innovative masterpieces.

User avatar
Sableagle
Ormurinn's Alt
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:26 pm UTC
Location: The wrong side of the mirror
Contact:

Re: 2042: "Rolle's Theorem"

Postby Sableagle » Tue Sep 25, 2018 6:12 pm UTC

I honestly don't mind if someone wants to alternate 12- and 10-syllable lines or use ABABCDEEDC rhyming patterns or reverse the rhyme system so the lines start out the same and then get different. If someone just adds lots of dots, spaces and line feeds to their sentence, though, that's not a poem. It's the usenet representation of a speech impediment.
Oh, Willie McBride, it was all done in vain.

User avatar
Euphonium
Posts: 162
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 11:17 pm UTC
Location: in ur bourgeois bosses' union, agitating ur workers

Re: 2042: "Rolle's Theorem"

Postby Euphonium » Tue Sep 25, 2018 6:56 pm UTC

Sableagle wrote:I honestly don't mind if someone wants to alternate 12- and 10-syllable lines or use ABABCDEEDC rhyming patterns or reverse the rhyme system so the lines start out the same and then get different. If someone just adds lots of dots, spaces and line feeds to their sentence, though, that's not a poem. It's the usenet representation of a speech impediment.


No. In a lot of printed poetry, the visual representation on the page is part of it. Maybe they're using the dots to indicate pauses, or they deploy the blank lines in a way that builds suspense in the reader, or perhaps they're using the spaces to create a sensation of lingering over the last word before the next one comes up.

Artists are fucking creative, after all.

User avatar
Eebster the Great
Posts: 3107
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:58 am UTC
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Re: 2042: "Rolle's Theorem"

Postby Eebster the Great » Tue Sep 25, 2018 7:08 pm UTC

I think in the tradition of "concrete poetry," that sort of manipulation is pretty much mandatory. Of course, you try to make the line divisions as textually meaningful as possible anyway, but you are constrained by the shape, and that takes priority. In conventional poetry though, style choices like that can be perplexing. I've never heard a satisfactory explanation of dashes in Dickinson's poems. That doesn't mean they are meaningless or ruin the poetry—I don't think many people would argue Emily Dickinson lacked a sense of style—but it just means that I don't get it.

There is plenty of bad poetry out there, and some of it surely has poorly placed punctuation, but just because you don't know why a particular choice was made does not automatically make it a bad one.

User avatar
Sableagle
Ormurinn's Alt
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:26 pm UTC
Location: The wrong side of the mirror
Contact:

Re: 2042: "Rolle's Theorem"

Postby Sableagle » Tue Sep 25, 2018 7:42 pm UTC

There is
plenty
....................................................... of
bad ..............

................ poetry
out there,
and
some
.................................. of it
............................................ surely
has poorly ..................................

placed ................
punctuation,
but just
because

................you................ don't
................know
why
a particular choice ................

was made
does not
automatically
make it
a
bad one. ................
Oh, Willie McBride, it was all done in vain.


Return to “Individual XKCD Comic Threads”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fungo4, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 33 guests