This forum is for the individual discussion thread that goes with each new comic.
Moderators: Moderators General, Magistrates, Prelates
by GuitarFreak » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:10 am UTC

Alt text: On the other hand, physicists like to say physics is to math as sex is to masturbation.
Hah, my science teachers always say their science is the central science etc. But math rules!

Cooler than a bose-einstein condensate
Bakemaster wrote:I went to high school with a girl whose middle name was Nguyen and whose last name was Huynh. It was a win-win situation.
-

GuitarFreak
-
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 7:30 am UTC
- Location: Nanticoke PA
by nekodromeda » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:12 am UTC
Dammit, it may be right on the money, but everyone still has value, dammit!
(Former bio major-turned-psych major)
-
nekodromeda
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 5:13 am UTC
by Scigatt » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:13 am UTC
I really want to invoke Godwin's law on this one...
-

Scigatt
-
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:45 am UTC
- Location: Vancouver
-
by Drake Zure » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:13 am UTC
Anyways, I found this one highly amusing. It's another one of those undeniably true things.
Darn you, Randall, and your undeniably true things!
And you think biology/psychology is hard to admit that from? Try being a writer!
benjhuey wrote:IceMod wrote:The fingers did surprise me though.
That's what SHE said.
And then she left. I wonder why...
-

Drake Zure
-
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:57 am UTC
- Location: Everywhere, nowhere, it's all very abstract...
by Megums » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:15 am UTC
Yay math!
Then again, my interests lie at both ends of the spectrum.
(though math undoubtedly pwns all)
edit: The psychologist looks like my math teacher. Just throwing that out there. o.o
Last edited by
Megums on Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:17 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.
-

Megums
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 1:39 am UTC
by nekodromeda » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:16 am UTC
Drake Zure wrote:You failed to comment, OP.
Anyways, I found this one highly amusing. It's another one of those undeniably true things.
Darn you, Randall, and your undeniably true things!
And you think biology/psychology is hard to admit that from? Try being a writer!
I think I heard a story about a guy who started college as an English major and left as a math major. His rationale was that English and by extension, literature was just all psychology, really....and psychology was just all biology....and biology was all chemistry....and chemistry was all physics...and since physics was just all math, that's where he ended.
Though I have to wonder- where does CS fall?
-
nekodromeda
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 5:13 am UTC
by espire » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:17 am UTC
I love the glasses and goatee to signify the psychologist, but why not give everybody a face, or at least something to designate their profession? A bit of polish could go a long way...
-

espire
-
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:22 pm UTC
by GodShapedBullet » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:18 am UTC
Math is just applied language arts.
Using our powers of semantic representation to add stuff together.
-

GodShapedBullet
-
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:59 pm UTC
- Location: Wilmingmegaton
-
by fenrir_darkwolf » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:19 am UTC
So true... I tease all my friends going into engineering, chemistry, life-sci etc. that it's just applied physics.
"You're gonna have to learn everything anyway, so which is first is not essential."
-Richard Feynman
-

fenrir_darkwolf
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:21 pm UTC
by jmorgan3 » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:20 am UTC
nekodromeda wrote:I have to wonder- where does CS fall?
And engineering?
This signature is Y2K compliant.
Last updated 6/29/108
-

jmorgan3
-
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:22 am UTC
- Location: Pasadena, CA
by GodShapedBullet » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:20 am UTC
fenrir_darkwolf wrote:So true... I tease all my friends going into engineering, chemistry, life-sci etc. that it's just applied physics.
Yeah, because something being applicable is so pejorative.
-

GodShapedBullet
-
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:59 pm UTC
- Location: Wilmingmegaton
-
by Dark Shikari » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:20 am UTC
This reminds me of a discussion I had with a coworker about where the hell video encoding and compression technology falls on the spectrum of various sciences and college majors.
Its mostly done by electrical engineers, but that's only because they're the signal processing gurus; they often don't know crap about writing a good program. The most interesting algorithms are always written by CS majors, but they're often overly mathematical. There's a lot of core theory done by mathematicians, of course. And then in the end, one can make a valid claim that the entire subject is really just psychology, because its all about optimizing for the human visual system rather than any mathematical metric.
-
Dark Shikari
-
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:03 am UTC
by phlip » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:21 am UTC
Well, once we have the intelligence and/or computing power to predict the emergent properties of complex systems, maths and physics will be all we need. Until then, the lesser sciences will be permitted to survive.
nekodromeda wrote:I have to wonder- where does CS fall?
Computing is applied electronics, which is a branch of physics. So probably about the same level as Chemistry.
Last edited by
phlip on Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:25 am UTC, edited 2 times in total.
While no one overhear you quickly tell me not cow cow.
but how about watch phone?
-

phlip
- Restorer of Worlds
-
- Posts: 6740
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:56 am UTC
- Location: Australia
-
by pliny » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:21 am UTC
GodShapedBullet wrote:Math is just applied language arts.
Using our powers of semantic representation to add stuff together.
I said something along those lines, but I was thinking more logic.
I guess I must've crossed some social boundary, for my post was deleted.
Edit: my mistake, it was a mis-click of my own that lead to its demise.
Last edited by
pliny on Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:22 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.
Don't look behind you.
It doesn't like to be seen.
-

pliny
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:13 am UTC
by thebandit » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:22 am UTC
The psychologist IS my English teacher.
Good touch making the mathematician a woman.
-
thebandit
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:09 am UTC
- Location: Sacramento
by Drake Zure » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:22 am UTC
GodShapedBullet wrote:Math is just applied language arts.
Using our powers of semantic representation to add stuff together.
Is it wrong in some way that that's the single sexiest thing I've read all day, despite the fact that all communications that I have with my significant other are online?
benjhuey wrote:IceMod wrote:The fingers did surprise me though.
That's what SHE said.
And then she left. I wonder why...
-

Drake Zure
-
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:57 am UTC
- Location: Everywhere, nowhere, it's all very abstract...
by Robin S » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:23 am UTC
nekodromeda wrote:Though I have to wonder- where does CS fall?
CS falls under Maths, but in a different direction from the other sciences.
jmorgan3 wrote:And engineering?
Well, being not pure in the slightest, it would presumably be at the point at infinity.
Who hasn't thought about this hierarchy at one point or another? It was also nice to see
a preview of today's comic. It reminded me a little of "
Certainty".
limu->i(patience)=0
-
Robin S
-
- Posts: 3557
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:02 pm UTC
- Location: London, UK
-
by pliny » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:25 am UTC
phlip wrote:Well, once we have the intelligence and/or computing power to predict the emergent properties of complex systems, maths and physics will be all we need. Until then, the lesser sciences will be permitted to survive.
And what will become of them? When you use a computer to apply math to a biological problem, you're still doing the same thing as before, only with a computer. The "lesser" sciences will remain, because they are more convenient names for "mathematical applications in the realm of psychology/sociology/biology/etc".
Don't look behind you.
It doesn't like to be seen.
-

pliny
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:13 am UTC
by digitrev » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:26 am UTC
And I'm a math physics major. Masochists bridging the gap.
Together we will make the octopus nervous.

-

digitrev
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:22 pm UTC
- Location: Ontario, Canada
-
by Drake Zure » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:27 am UTC
Robin S wrote:nekodromeda wrote:*stuff not relevant to this post*
It reminded me a little of "
Certainty".
same mathametician.
benjhuey wrote:IceMod wrote:The fingers did surprise me though.
That's what SHE said.
And then she left. I wonder why...
-

Drake Zure
-
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:57 am UTC
- Location: Everywhere, nowhere, it's all very abstract...
by Gammashield » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:28 am UTC
One truism of that scale I've found is that pretty much anyone considers their step, and one step to either side "real" science. Anything higher up is just playing with numbers and/or too abstract to apply to the world around us, and anything further down is is too fuzzy and hokey to be real, rigorous thinking.
-

Gammashield
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:41 pm UTC
by pliny » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:28 am UTC
The Rumpled Academic wrote:What is this "pure" nonsense? Numbers are human inventions.
Whoops, I missed this before. Agreed!
The concept of discrete, quantifiable increments would not arise in a universe devoid of discreteness of incrementalness.
It's just convenient for us.
Don't look behind you.
It doesn't like to be seen.
-

pliny
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:13 am UTC
by mopatop » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:29 am UTC
This comic = made of truth
-
mopatop
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 4:33 am UTC
by Lumpy » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:29 am UTC
Reminds me of that episode of The Big Bang Theory when one of the physicist characters went into the engineering lab and called them the little "Oompa Loompas of science."
-

Lumpy
- I can has morbid obesity?
-
- Posts: 1450
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 2:19 pm UTC
by GodShapedBullet » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:30 am UTC
Drake Zure wrote:GodShapedBullet wrote:Math is just applied language arts.
Using our powers of semantic representation to add stuff together.
Is it wrong in some way that that's the single sexiest thing I've read all day, despite the fact that all communications that I have with my significant other are online?
Nah.
My number one aspiration when I post is to be sexy.
-

GodShapedBullet
-
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:59 pm UTC
- Location: Wilmingmegaton
-
by timt » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:30 am UTC
Funny, where i live your be riddled for doing the subject with the least amount of applicability as they are less effective in the "real world".
-
timt
-
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 1:48 am UTC
- Location: Kentucky, USA
by pliny » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:30 am UTC
mopatop wrote:This comic = made of truth
But truth is just applied thought.
Don't look behind you.
It doesn't like to be seen.
-

pliny
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:13 am UTC
by wingie » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:31 am UTC
This strip reminds me of a joke that my old differential geometry professor told me in grad school:
Sociologists want to be psychologists, because if you understand the brain you can understand society.
Psychologists want to be biologists, because if you understand life you can understand the brain.
Biologists want to be chemists, because if you understand matter you understand life.
Chemists want to be physicists, because if you understand the universe you understand matter.
Physicists want to be God.
God wants to be a mathematician.
He cited this joke as the reason why he left physics and became a mathematician.
-

wingie
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:28 am UTC
- Location: Putney, VT
-
by DoubleAW » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:31 am UTC
This is one of those comics that makes you think "oh SNAP" when you read it to the end. Brilliant as usual.
-
DoubleAW
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 1:57 am UTC
by Nomenclaturist » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:32 am UTC
As both a chemist and a mathematician, I find this comic to be full of nothing but win. Thank you Randall, thank you *single tear*.
*tries to come up with witty signature*
*Fails*
-
Nomenclaturist
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 3:34 am UTC
by Izawwlgood » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:32 am UTC
Math is just philosophy?
-I know this: if life is illusion, then I am no less an illusion, and being thus, the illusion is real to me. I live, I burn with life, I love, I slay, and am content.
-We can't go back. But I suppose we can go wherever we please.
-

Izawwlgood
- WINNING
-
- Posts: 13965
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:55 pm UTC
- Location: There may be lovelier lovelies...
by rwald » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:34 am UTC
I actually didn't like this comic, mainly because having been a biologist at a technology school, this spectrum was basically an assumed fact of life, understood by everyone. This is like if xkcd did a comic on one of those "an engineer, a physicist, and a mathematician" jokes; funny the first time you heard it, less relevant after everyone's told it, heard it, and gotten sick of it.
-

rwald
-
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:14 am UTC
by pliny » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:34 am UTC
Izawwlgood wrote:Math is just philosophy?
And philosophy is just thought and opinion.
We should all become philosophers? Watch the world decay. :- D
Don't look behind you.
It doesn't like to be seen.
-

pliny
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:13 am UTC
by Dynastic » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:35 am UTC
Obviously the analogy mentioned in the Alt-Text is the opposite of the truth. The satisfaction from math is much moreso than that of Physics, and I'm sure most normal people would agree that the satisfaction from sex is much moreso than that of masturbation.
-

Dynastic
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 3:57 am UTC
by AstralRunner » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:36 am UTC
Biology is only partly applied chemistry. The main part of it, evolution by natural selection, is not dependent on the physical nature of the replicators in question: it applies to any conceivable or inconceivable system of randomly varying replicators under non-random selective pressure. Indeed, genetic computer programs have been made which compete for CPU cycles, and the principles of evolution apply to life there just the same as to that arising on Earth.
"We must be physicists in order to be creative since so far codes of values and ideals have been constructed in ignorance of physics or even in contradiction to physics."
~Friedrich Nietzsche
-
AstralRunner
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:14 am UTC
by pliny » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:38 am UTC
Dynastic wrote:Obviously the analogy mentioned in the Alt-Text is the opposite of the truth. The satisfaction from math is much moreso than that of Physics, and I'm sure most normal people would agree that the satisfaction from sex is much moreso than that of masturbation.
But math in and of itself isn't anything. It may provide the basis for all of whatever, but it has no reality until it is applied to something. I don't think the alt-text was referring to satisfaction, but rather to interaction, and the satisfaction from
that.
Don't look behind you.
It doesn't like to be seen.
-

pliny
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:13 am UTC
by GodShapedBullet » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:39 am UTC
pliny wrote:Dynastic wrote:Obviously the analogy mentioned in the Alt-Text is the opposite of the truth. The satisfaction from math is much moreso than that of Physics, and I'm sure most normal people would agree that the satisfaction from sex is much moreso than that of masturbation.
But math in and of itself isn't anything. It may provide the basis for all of whatever, but it has no reality until it is applied to something. I don't think the alt-text was referring to satisfaction, but rather to interaction, and the satisfaction from
that.
And you could carry that analogy all the way back to sociology or whatever kind of science Physicists and Mathematicians are too snooty for.
-

GodShapedBullet
-
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:59 pm UTC
- Location: Wilmingmegaton
-
by wingie » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:39 am UTC
Dynastic wrote:Obviously the analogy mentioned in the Alt-Text is the opposite of the truth. The satisfaction from math is much moreso than that of Physics, and I'm sure most normal people would agree that the satisfaction from sex is much moreso than that of masturbation.
I think of mathematics as loving coitus with all of existence (and non-existence), while physics is like a visit to the womb of the diseases infested prostitute known as "the real world" in the back alley between Heaven and Hell.
-

wingie
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:28 am UTC
- Location: Putney, VT
-
by Vinz » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:40 am UTC
edit : What I wanted to say was already said

sorry
Last edited by
Vinz on Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:44 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.
-
Vinz
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:37 am UTC
Return to Individual XKCD Comic Threads
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: 42isall, 8yd1217p, AluisioASG, Angelastic, Dracomax, Earthling on Mars, ElWanderer, Flotter, jplvchde, Kazza3, MobTeeseboose, mscha, Offebpale, Rule110, Sytri, thevicente, VoronX and 36 guests