Moderators: phlip, Moderators General, Prelates
FiddleMath wrote:Firefox extension: Meta-tabs: Seriously. Why can't I make a tab that contains other tabs in Firefox? I tend to browse along trees, and would like to be able to group my browsing accordingly.
Rework a strongly statically-typed functional language, like OCAML or Haskell, so that Lisp-like macros are possible. (I'm not actually sure it's possible, but it would be awesome.)
EvanED wrote:* A new shell/terminal, but with a rather different slant than FiddleMath's idea. Though... maybe the ideas could be combined? But mine sort of has as couple goals. An explicit non-goal at the moment is programmability; the work of doing this doesn't seem like the benefit is worth it until the other stuff is in place, at which point other projects would probably become more appealing.The idea would be to make the common tasks while in a shell easier. For instance, instead of just tab completion, you get a list of completions "Intellisense" style.
FiddleMath wrote:Task-Stack Tracker: when I'm coding, or in the middle of a lot of work, or deep in a mathematical proof, I often find that I overflow my (admittedly small) mental stack. By the notion that computers can help us think better, write a simple mental stack tracer. This is very lightweight, yes, and probably easy to code once the interface is determined. However, since this is supposed to be a tool to help you think, when your brain is already nearly fully loaded, it needs to be very easy to use. The user interface design, here, is actually the most important part.
OmenPigeon wrote:The pet project thats been rattling around in my head is a platform for writing fiction that separates the content from the structure. Like someone handed you a shoebox full of newspaper clippings instead of a bound novel. As an author it would let you create pieces of the story on logical entities called 'cards' or something similar, and provide some sort of metadata about the cards if desired. The cards could contain text and images, at the very least. As a reader it would present you with a random card to begin with, and then let you continue reading from there, either be grabbing another random card from the box, or by performing a search on the cards, based on something in the text of the card you're on. I think there would be some really nice interface solutions for that, like just double-clicking on a word or phrase would grab a card with that phrase on it, similarly with images. Authors would also be able to provide some sort of structure to the story, maybe, like with paperclips holding different clippings together. But that would be generally frowned upon, since the point isn't to construct a hypertext where the narrative has a parallel or tree or web structure, but to get rid of the structure entirely and just let the read find his way through different atomic pieces of story. (I also kind of like the idea that you might never quite know when you'd read all the cards. You might not be able to find new ones, but that doesn't guarantee that you found them all.)
EvanED wrote:* Multiplayer minesweeper. Whoever clears the most area or marks the most mines or something like that wins. Then add 3-d. (I have no clue how to actually display all that information though...) Then add other game-enhancing things, like if you click on a bomb your first, say, three clicks, have it rerandomize; it's really obnoxious to hit one right away before you have any information at all.
Firefox extension: Meta-tabs: Seriously. Why can't I make a tab that contains other tabs in Firefox? I tend to browse along trees, and would like to be able to group my browsing accordingly.
JoshJ wrote:put this in the URL bar:
chrome://browser/content/browser.xul
JoshJ wrote:Firefox extension: Meta-tabs: Seriously. Why can't I make a tab that contains other tabs in Firefox? I tend to browse along trees, and would like to be able to group my browsing accordingly.
This is already possible.
put this in the URL bar:
chrome://browser/content/browser.xul
FiddleMath wrote:Task-Stack Tracker: when I'm coding, or in the middle of a lot of work, or deep in a mathematical proof, I often find that I overflow my (admittedly small) mental stack. By the notion that computers can help us think better, write a simple mental stack tracer. This is very lightweight, yes, and probably easy to code once the interface is determined. However, since this is supposed to be a tool to help you think, when your brain is already nearly fully loaded, it needs to be very easy to use. The user interface design, here, is actually the most important part.
OmenPigeon wrote:The pet project thats been rattling around in my head is a platform for writing fiction that separates the content from the structure. Like someone handed you a shoebox full of newspaper clippings instead of a bound novel. As an author it would let you create pieces of the story on logical entities called 'cards' or something similar, and provide some sort of metadata about the cards if desired. The cards could contain text and images, at the very least. As a reader it would present you with a random card to begin with, and then let you continue reading from there, either be grabbing another random card from the box, or by performing a search on the cards, based on something in the text of the card you're on. I think there would be some really nice interface solutions for that, like just double-clicking on a word or phrase would grab a card with that phrase on it, similarly with images. Authors would also be able to provide some sort of structure to the story, maybe, like with paperclips holding different clippings together. But that would be generally frowned upon, since the point isn't to construct a hypertext where the narrative has a parallel or tree or web structure, but to get rid of the structure entirely and just let the read find his way through different atomic pieces of story. (I also kind of like the idea that you might never quite know when you'd read all the cards. You might not be able to find new ones, but that doesn't guarantee that you found them all.)
Users browsing this forum: trfpqpapa and 7 guests