Moderators: phlip, Larson, Moderators General, Prelates
I don't think it would be easier, but unless you plan on doing webdev and want to make Java applets, I think learning C++ would be a better choice. Actually, since you know C, it probably would be easier too.samspotting wrote:On a sidenote, I was thinking about learning C++, but from what i heard about the language I think it would be way easier to learn Java.
_=0,w=-1,(*t)(int,int);a()??<char*p="[gd\
~/d~/\\b\x7F\177l*~/~djal{x}h!\005h";(++w
<033)?(putchar((*t)(w??(p:>,w?_:0XD)),a()
):0;%>O(x,l)??<_='['/7;{return!(x%(_-11))
?x??'l:x^(1+ ++l);}??>main(){t=&O;w=a();}headprogrammingczar wrote:Don't bother with C++. The jargon file says the predominant belief about C++ is that a cleaner languagebased onwithout all the crazy crap of C++ would be almost exactly like Java.
Yakk wrote:headprogrammingczar wrote:Don't bother with C++. The jargon file says the predominant belief about C++ is that a cleaner languagebased onwithout all the crazy crap of C++ would be almost exactly like Java.
... yet have the ability to do systems programming, have the option to not have garbage collection, keep multiple inheritance, keep operator overloading, compiling to native code, etc.
godrik wrote:I believe that "Thinking in java" is a free book designed to learn the basic of java. Since it is free, it should be easy to get a pdf version of it.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests