1257: "Monster"

This forum is for the individual discussion thread that goes with each new comic.

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

Wulfram
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:14 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

But you can negotiate with a two year old.

peewee_RotA
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 1:19 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

pkcommando wrote:
jay35 wrote:So the monster is now deader than a doornail?

But before they killed it, they had to hit it w/ enough tranquilizer to knock out 3 elephants.

But we ended up with a death toll as high as the latest tsunami.
"Vowels have trouble getting married in Canada. They can’t pronounce their O’s."

Fire Brns
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 2:25 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

The damaged caused by the monster cost more than 100 space shuttles.
Pfhorrest wrote:As someone who is not easily offended, I don't really mind anything in this conversation.
Mighty Jalapeno wrote:It was the Renaissance. Everyone was Italian.

Klear
Posts: 1965
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:43 am UTC
Location: Prague

Re: 1257: "Monster"

Hmm.. trying the dictionary of numbers myself:

33.3 m/s ≈ Land speed record for a human powered vehicle

I laughed until I realized that a bike is a human powered vehicle.

And I am quite disappointed that it doesn't return anything for 42.

Posts: 1028
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:11 pm UTC
Location: Brazil

Re: 1257: "Monster"

davidstarlingm wrote:
Barstro wrote:Let's see.

A cheetah's top speed is 120 kph (33.3 m/s) (EDIT: I think I have the correct figure now)
A blue whale has a mass of 170,000 kilograms

Momentum is P=20,400,000 5,666,667. I have no idea what that translates into. Anyone have a good comparison?

Better to look at kinetic energy, which is around 1e8 Joules -- the same as the kinetic energy of a landing jumbo jet.

And his screech was five times louder than said jumbo jet engines.

flamewise
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 2:40 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

Right, so I went to google and typed "as ... as a" and picked the first sensible auto completion.

My own frequently-made comparison monster is as long as a road, as fast as a hare, as heavy as a lead (?), and as intelligent as a dolphin.

I guess I'll have a chance to win a fight, although I hope it's a short road.

NDB
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 4:53 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

The bowels of the monster, lying on the ground after its defeat, were long enough to wrap around the Earth's equator just over 3 times.

Whizbang
The Best Reporter
Posts: 2238
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 7:50 pm UTC
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: 1257: "Monster"

That monster is bog, I'll grant you... But not as big as yo mama!

TimeLurker
Posts: 290
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 3:07 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

Randall can mock numbers without context (blag: Dictionary of Numbers) and we love it.
Randall can mock context without numbers (1257: Monster) and we join in on the fun.

He truely can do no wrong.
Voice of the Silent
Owner of the contents of Cueball's head
Lurking Time-Ninja of the Past-Post

Klear
Posts: 1965
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:43 am UTC
Location: Prague

Re: 1257: "Monster"

flamewise wrote:Right, so I went to google and typed "as ... as a" and picked the first sensible auto completion.

My own frequently-made comparison monster is as long as a road, as fast as a hare, as heavy as a lead (?), and as intelligent as a dolphin.

I guess I'll have a chance to win a fight, although I hope it's a short road.

Hmm.. nice idea.

I've got one, as evil as ignorance...
...as dangerous as smoking...
...as ugly as sin...
...as cunning as a fox...
...as real as a dream.

boothby171
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 8:56 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

I know that the point was NOT to come up with a concrete example, but was I the only one to think, "Bandersnatch?"

Flumble
Yes Man
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 9:35 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

Klear wrote:Hmm.. trying the dictionary of numbers myself:

33.3 m/s ≈ Land speed record for a human powered vehicle

I laughed until I realized that a bike is a human powered vehicle.

That's odd. Even the unpaced cycling records go up to 133km/h (37m/s) and they go up to 335km/h (93m/s) when using slipstream or going downhill.

smileyy
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 6:42 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

I guess I got lucky. The one I ran into was only the size of a fox terrier.

Uh...how big is a fox terrier?

Barstro
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 2:34 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

Flumble wrote:
Klear wrote:Hmm.. trying the dictionary of numbers myself:

33.3 m/s ≈ Land speed record for a human powered vehicle

I laughed until I realized that a bike is a human powered vehicle.

That's odd. Even the unpaced cycling records go up to 133km/h (37m/s) and they go up to 335km/h (93m/s) when using slipstream or going downhill.

I think the record is for unassisted human powered vehicle. If you are on a bike, it's presumed that you are using performance enhancing drugs.

The monster was as unethical as Armstrong.

ricketybridge
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 8:34 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

Is anyone else trying to envision this monster? I'm thinking it looks like an enormous cheetah (since it needs to be able to travel as fast, and I would imagine that a cheetah that big being able to wolf down quite a number of people), though obviously it has to be smarter than a cheetah. This thing is sounding pretty adorable. I'd definitely want to ride it after it was satiated.

BlitzGirl
Posts: 9098
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:48 am UTC
Location: Out of the basement for Yip 6! Schizoblitz: 115/2672 NP
Contact:

Re: 1257: "Monster"

Sounds like a relative of the One True Cat:

Knight Temporal of the One True Comic
BlitzGirl the Pink, Mopey Molpy Mome
Spoiler:

<Profile
~.~.FAQ->

pkcommando
Posts: 569
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 3:22 pm UTC
Location: Allston, MA

Re: 1257: "Monster"

BlitzGirl wrote:Sounds like a relative of the One True Cat:

-1 internets for making me embarrass myself at work w/ a very loud lol

+101 internets for making me embarrass myself at work w/ a very loud lol

StCredZero
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:52 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

jay35 wrote:So the monster is now deader than a doornail?

A sci-fi alien race that's barely more alive than doornails...

Has potential.

StCredZero
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:52 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

dalcde wrote:Actually all measures are relative. Mass in kilogram is relative to that of the International Prototype of the Kilogram. Time in seconds is relative to the time of the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium-133 atom.

(Okay the number of people is not a relative measure, but you get my point)

The speed of light isn't a relative measure. In fact, isn't the meter now defined as the the distance light travels in a vacuum in 1/299792458 seconds? Or is it that a second is the time it takes for light to travel 299792458 meters in a vacuum?

Trickster
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 5:56 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

I don't know if anyone else did this, but I spent several minutes trying to figure out what "it" was from the speech bubbles before finally reading the caption and votey.

Trickster
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 5:56 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

StCredZero wrote:
dalcde wrote:Actually all measures are relative. Mass in kilogram is relative to that of the International Prototype of the Kilogram. Time in seconds is relative to the time of the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium-133 atom.

(Okay the number of people is not a relative measure, but you get my point)

The speed of light isn't a relative measure. In fact, isn't the meter now defined as the the distance light travels in a vacuum in 1/299792458 seconds? Or is it that a second is the time it takes for light to travel 299792458 meters in a vacuum?

There are several dimensionless constants in physics, as well.

It's true that some things are relative, like we wouldn't notice if the speed of light changed at the same time that time and distance changed (one might question if that's even a thing which is part of our universe in that case), but our universe isn't just a mishmash of relative dimensionality. There are even things independent of universe at all, like logic, "one", tau, etc.

orangedragonfire
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 3:45 am UTC
Location: It exists. Probably.

Re: 1257: "Monster"

It's breath smells as bad as an entire dumpster.

Mikeski
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:24 am UTC
Location: Minnesota, USA

Re: 1257: "Monster"

I think we can all agree, #1257 was as funny as 1.00 xkcd comics.

BlitzGirl
Posts: 9098
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:48 am UTC
Location: Out of the basement for Yip 6! Schizoblitz: 115/2672 NP
Contact:

Re: 1257: "Monster"

As much fun as a barrel of molpies!
Knight Temporal of the One True Comic
BlitzGirl the Pink, Mopey Molpy Mome
Spoiler:

<Profile
~.~.FAQ->

Posts: 5654
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:03 am UTC
Location: The Netherlands

Re: 1257: "Monster"

But is it bigger than a mole of moles?
It's one of those irregular verbs, isn't it? I have an independent mind, you are an eccentric, he is round the twist
- Bernard Woolley in Yes, Prime Minister

Jamaican Castle
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:10 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

Diadem wrote:But is it bigger than a mole of moles?

I sure hope not. I'm not certain how to go about fighting moon-sized alien monsters.

Pfhorrest
Posts: 5441
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:11 am UTC
Contact:

Re: 1257: "Monster"

StCredZero wrote:The speed of light isn't a relative measure.

It's a relative measure in the same sense that a meter is a relative measure. We compare how fast light moves relative to how fast other things move, the same way that we compare how big something is relative to how big other things are.

The sense in which the speed of light is not relative is the same as that in which meters were (classically, not accounting for Lorentz contraction) not relative. No matter where you are (in a classical universe), a meter is still a meter; but "a meter" means a certain size which we understand by comparison to other things of known size. Likewise, no matter how fast you're moving, light is still moving the same speed relative to you, but the speed at which it is moving is still expressed in terms of distance measured relative to things of known size per time measured relative to events of known duration. The speed of light is constant, but the measure of that speed is still made relative to something else: it's just that, when we make measurements relative to other things, we find that the speed of light is always measured the same relative to those things no matter how we (and the things we're measuring with) are moving.

Other Planck units are likewise still relative even though they are universal constants.
Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of All Trades
"I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
The Codex Quaerendae (my philosophy) - The Chronicles of Quelouva (my fiction)

cantab314
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 6:03 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

If this were a blockbuster movie, the Frequently-Made Comparisons monster woul have been defeated by a robot the height of Nelson's column stacked on top of the Empire State Building, with a reactor core that could generate as much power as three thousand Bugatti Veyrons, and firing a laser that could light up a town of 20,000 people for 50 years.

Whizbang
The Best Reporter
Posts: 2238
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 7:50 pm UTC
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: 1257: "Monster"

It would take a hero with the strength of a thousand men, wielding a magic sword that burns with the light of a thousand suns, to fight this monster.

ricketybridge
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 8:34 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

BlitzGirl wrote:Sounds like a relative of the One True Cat:

So cuuuuuute!!!!

peewee_RotA
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 1:19 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

StCredZero wrote:
jay35 wrote:So the monster is now deader than a doornail?

A sci-fi alien race that's barely more alive than doornails...

Has potential.

Yes it did. I've written a role playing game where you fight off a sci-fi/horror monster with whatever resources that you have around. My favorite monster so far is making them fight off schrodinger's cat. The best part is that the cat attacked an unsuspecting group of hikers. The players never found the bodies so they're still not sure if the hikers have died.

"Vowels have trouble getting married in Canada. They can’t pronounce their O’s."

Jackpot777
Posts: 328
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:19 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

Djehutynakht wrote:
rhomboidal wrote:This monster sounds familiar. I think Godzilla might've fought it/fucked it in the 19th sequel or thereabouts...

...that's a very interesting "either...or..."

srwight
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 1:31 am UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

I can't help wondering if this is about cancer.

BlitzGirl
Posts: 9098
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:48 am UTC
Location: Out of the basement for Yip 6! Schizoblitz: 115/2672 NP
Contact:

Re: 1257: "Monster"

srwight wrote:I can't help wondering if this is about cancer.

Must be the...

Knight Temporal of the One True Comic
BlitzGirl the Pink, Mopey Molpy Mome
Spoiler:

<Profile
~.~.FAQ->

Coyoty
Posts: 195
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:56 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

Sounds like a rocket-propelled dirigible-like dugong. Which is why witnesses to the destruction kept crying, "Oh, the huge manatee!"

Barstro wrote:Let's see.

A cheetah's top speed is 120 kph (33.3 m/s) (EDIT: I think I have the correct figure now)
A blue whale has a mass of 170,000 kilograms

Momentum is P=20,400,000 5,666,667. I have no idea what that translates into. Anyone have a good comparison?

However, with the mass of a blue whale, but three times as long, it's density seems pretty low. Unless, of course, it has a very narrow cross-section.

Muzer
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 4:00 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

Bah-dum, tss.

mooncow
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 2:12 pm UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

I'm sure the real problem is that the comparison monster is being made so frequently. Makes it very hard to eliminate entirely.

da Doctah
Posts: 983
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 6:27 am UTC

Re: 1257: "Monster"

BlitzGirl wrote:As much fun as a barrel of molpies!
Select amount of fun (each line is twice as much fun as the line preceding):
• a gallon of monkeys
• a firkin of monkeys
• a kilderkin of monkeys
• a barrel of monkeys
• a butt of monkeys
• a tun of monkeys

The most useful point on this scale appears to be near the middle.

Klear
Posts: 1965
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:43 am UTC
Location: Prague

Re: 1257: "Monster"

As much fun as quarter of a monkey...

BlitzGirl
Posts: 9098
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:48 am UTC
Location: Out of the basement for Yip 6! Schizoblitz: 115/2672 NP
Contact:

Re: 1257: "Monster"

Klear wrote:As much fun as quarter of a monkey...

Which quarter?
Knight Temporal of the One True Comic
BlitzGirl the Pink, Mopey Molpy Mome
Spoiler:

<Profile
~.~.FAQ->