For the discussion of language mechanics, grammar, vocabulary, trends, and other such linguistic topics, in english and other languages.
10 posts • Page 1 of 1
What makes one word "cooler" than another? As an example, why do I think "genesis" sounds cooler than "origin"?
Does anybody have any idea of what the hell energy is? It's the thing that, when applied to something, gives itself to the thing so that the thing can expend it, applying it to other things in multiple forms of it. What the hell is it?
Hmm. That's a tricky question, and it seems reminiscent of the idea of inherently funny words. In some cases coolness might simply stem from the phonetics of a word, but in other cases I think it's affected by esthetic and cultural associations. In the case of genesis, I think part of it might be that Greek words sound cooler than their Latin equivalents: in the Greco-Roman equation, it's the Greek part that seems more ancient and mysterious. Don't tetra- and penta- sound cooler than quadri- and quinti-? There may also be the association with the Book of Genesis, which gives the word a certain cosmic grandeur that's lacking in the more mundane origin.
Exit the vampires' castle.
Suspects the frequency of encountering it (and similar words). Says "original" more than "genetic". Loses its luster over time. Noticed it with "epic", personally.
Changes its form depending on the observer.
Lazar wrote:I think part of it might be that Greek words sound cooler than their Latin equivalents: in the Greco-Roman equation, it's the Greek part that seems more ancient and mysterious. Don't tetra- and penta- sound cooler than quadri- and quinti-?
I agree with you. And yet, when the Alien films were released on DVD they made up "Quadrilogy" instead of using the more traditional "Tetralogy". I guess that by making up a new word, it felt fresher and more unfamiliar, and hence cooler, which ties in with what Deva said.
Honestly, I worried that the real reason was that more people would recognize the made-up word than the real one. Which sort of does fold in with the idea that quad- or quadra- is a rather common and workmanlike prefix.
So much depends upon a red wheel barrow (>= XXII) but it is not going to be installed.
she / her / her
she / her / her
I don't exactly know but it brings to mind that not just 'coolness' but many qualities can be inferred from the sound of a word:
And so on. Full article to be found here
Nearly 100 years of linguistics research has been based on the assumption that words are just collections of sounds - an agreed acoustic representation that has little to do with their actual meaning. Yet a spate of recent studies challenge this idea.
They suggest that we seem instinctively to link certain sounds with particular sensory perceptions. Some words really do evoke Humpty's "handsome" rotundity. Others might bring to mind a spiky appearance, a bitter taste, or a sense of swift movement. And when you know where to look, these patterns crop up surprisingly often, allowing a monoglot English speaker to understand more Swahili or Japanese than you might imagine (see "Which sounds bigger?" at the bottom of this article). These cross-sensory connections may even open a window onto the first words ever uttered by our ancestors, giving us a glimpse of the earliest language and how it emerged.
While the German psychologist Wolfgang Kohler was staying in Tenerife, he presented subjects with line drawings of two meaningless shapes - one spiky, the other curved - and asked them to label the pictures either "takete" or "baluba". Most people chose takete for the spiky shape and baluba for the curvy one. Though Kohler didn't say why this might be, the observation strongly suggested that some words really might fit the things they describe better than others. His work, first published in 1929, did not attract much attention, and though others returned to the subject every now and then, their findings were not taken seriously by the mainstream. "They were considered a curiosity and never properly explored," says Gabriella Vigliocco, professor of the psychology of language at University College London.
The turning point came in 2001, when Vilayanur S. Ramachandran and Edward Hubbard, both then at the University of California, San Diego, published their investigations into a condition known as synaesthesia, in which people seem to blend sensory experiences, including certain sounds and certain images (Journal of Consciousness Studies, vol 8, p 3). As many as 1 in 20 people have this condition, but Ramachandran suspected that cross-sensory connections are in fact a feature of the human brain, so that in practice we all experience synaesthesia at least to a limited extent. To explore this idea, he and Hubbard revisited Kohler's experiment to find out whether average people, and not just synaesthetes, might automatically link two different sensations.
Using similar shapes to those in the original experiment, but changing the names of the invented terms slightly, they found that an astonishing 95 per cent of people labelled the spiky object as "kiki" and the curvy one as "bouba".
Building on the idea that certain words might elicit cross-sensory connections in our brain, a team at the University of Edinburgh, UK, decided to explore the links between sounds and tastes.
Christine Cuskley, Simon Kirby and Julia Simner dropped bitter, sweet, salty and sour drops of solution into their subjects' mouths. Then they asked them to manipulate a computer synthesiser to produce different kinds of vowel sounds that seemed to best match the taste on their tongues. The results were not random. Sweet tastes were associated with high vowel sounds, in which the tongue is placed nearer to the roof of the mouth, and back vowels, where the tongue is placed towards the throat rather than the lips. The "oo" in boot demonstrates both of these traits. Low, front vowel sounds, meanwhile - something like the "a" in "cat" has these qualities - were associated with sour tastes
And so on. Full article to be found here
- GNU Terry Pratchett
- Posts: 26681
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
- Location: Here and There
There's some discussion of what sounds to put in brand names (specifically of chemicals and medications) in the comments to this Language Log post.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests