2034: "Equations"
Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates
2034: "Equations"
Title: All electromagnetic equations: The same as all fluid dynamics equations, but with the 8 and 23 replaced with the permittivity and permeability of free space, respectively.
I feel like the fluid dynamics equations needs an outer product of the gradient operator or something.
Last edited by gmalivuk on Fri Aug 17, 2018 10:47 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: added the mouseover text
Reason: added the mouseover text
 rhomboidal
 Posts: 795
 Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:25 pm UTC
 Contact:
Re: 2034: "Equations"
I'm not sure all the equations would fit on a Tshirt, but they would definitely fit as a fullbody tattoo.
Re: 2034: "Equations"
Is the `truly deep physics equations` just because of the simple formulas that involve the planck constant or is there something else?
Please be gracious in judging my english. (I am not a native speaker/writer.)
http://decodedarfur.org/
http://decodedarfur.org/

 Posts: 166
 Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 12:11 pm UTC
 Location: Oxford / London, United Kingdom, Europe
Re: 2034: "Equations"
H_hat is a Hamiltonian (perhaps even a general differential operator), not Planck's constant.
 Soupspoon
 You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
 Posts: 3962
 Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
 Location: 531
Re: 2034: "Equations"
(Missed out title text: All electromagnetic equations: The same as all fluid dynamics equations, but with the 8 and 23 replaced with the permittivity and permeability of free space, respectively.)
IRT last one as: <something> without You is (nothingness/empty/pointless?)
I'm fairly sure it is that, but it slightly outgeeks me.
IRT last one as: <something> without You is (nothingness/empty/pointless?)
I'm fairly sure it is that, but it slightly outgeeks me.
Re: 2034: "Equations"
I think I'm going to wait for the explainXKCD article to come up, then I'm going to reenroll in college to see if Fluids, Thermodynamics, and Fields classes get any easier.
Re: 2034: "Equations"
I didn't realize we knew enough about quantum gravity to actually have equations for it.
...or is that just ((representative of)  (a parody of)) a string theory equation?
...or is that just ((representative of)  (a parody of)) a string theory equation?

 Posts: 143
 Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 12:54 pm UTC
Re: 2034: "Equations"
richP wrote:I think I'm going to wait for the explainXKCD article to come up
I'm still not much the wiser!
yangosplat wrote:So many amazing quotes, so little room in 300 characters!
 Quizatzhaderac
 Posts: 1682
 Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:28 pm UTC
 Location: Space Florida
Re: 2034: "Equations"
We don't, at least not ones that belong to a generally accepted theory.SuperCow wrote:I didn't realize we knew enough about quantum gravity to actually have equations for it.
...or is that just ((representative of)  (a parody of)) a string theory equation?
SU(n) and U(n) each indicate a vector space (and certain operations) where each vector has n numbers. Nesting them doesn't make sense because 1) n needs to be an integer 2) n would typically be a specific fixed, small number, as these are less functions than a way to describe what kind of mathematical object we're using.
Those numbers look like someone took the number space for Grand Unified Theory (electromagnetism + weak force + strong force) and made them more complicated, as if they were adding gravity to the mix.
The thing about recursion problems is that they tend to contain other recursion problems.
Re: 2034: "Equations"
Also, that "quantum gravity" expression... actually, several of the things on this... are not even equations. It's not an equation without an equals sign.
Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of All Trades
"I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
The Codex Quaerendae (my philosophy)  The Chronicles of Quelouva (my fiction)
"I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
The Codex Quaerendae (my philosophy)  The Chronicles of Quelouva (my fiction)
 el matematico
 Posts: 113
 Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:20 pm UTC
Re: 2034: "Equations"
I'm pretty sure the joke about quantim gravity is that there are no equations at all, just some symmetry groups.
This is my blog (in Spanish). It's not perfect, but it's mine. http://falaci.blogspot.com/
Re: 2034: "Equations"
beojan wrote:H_hat is a Hamiltonian (perhaps even a general differential operator), not Planck's constant.
Because as any fule kno, Alexander Hamilton was most famous for wearing hats.
Re: 2034: "Equations"
The chemistry equations author was premed until he/she wrote the equation.
Re: 2034: "Equations"
I'm highly suspicious that the "Deep Physics Equation" MUST be normalized to read "= 42", or it won't work.
Re: 2034: "Equations"
Number theory itself produces gravity waves, so there's a nesting that ought to be taken into account.
 Soupspoon
 You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
 Posts: 3962
 Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
 Location: 531
Re: 2034: "Equations"
Number theory is your momma?
Re: 2034: "Equations"
Given the complexity of many formulae in modern physics, mathematics, etc. and the wide availability of Unicode I'm surprised we haven't gone beyond the standard greek/latin alphabet yet, instead choosing to use diacritics, typeface styles such as blackletter etc.
There are plenty of characters available in other alphabets, Cyrillic, Japanese, Chinese, Egyptian Hieroglyphs and so on. Even emojis might start becoming a standard (why not use a sun for temperature or a car for velocity? just an idea)
There are plenty of characters available in other alphabets, Cyrillic, Japanese, Chinese, Egyptian Hieroglyphs and so on. Even emojis might start becoming a standard (why not use a sun for temperature or a car for velocity? just an idea)
Re: 2034: "Equations"
gcgcgcgc wrote:Given the complexity of many formulae in modern physics, mathematics, etc. and the wide availability of Unicode I'm surprised we haven't gone beyond the standard greek/latin alphabet yet, instead choosing to use diacritics, typeface styles such as blackletter etc.
There are plenty of characters available in other alphabets, Cyrillic, Japanese, Chinese, Egyptian Hieroglyphs and so on. Even emojis might start becoming a standard (why not use a sun for temperature or a car for velocity? just an idea)
Mathematics has ventured into the Arabic alphabet in a few places  such as Alephs for cardinal infinities.
Re: 2034: "Equations"
Aleph is Hebrew, not Arabic.
So is bet.
All the standard numerals are Arabic, though.
(Unless you ask an actual Arab, then they're Indian).
So is bet.
All the standard numerals are Arabic, though.
(Unless you ask an actual Arab, then they're Indian).
Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of All Trades
"I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
The Codex Quaerendae (my philosophy)  The Chronicles of Quelouva (my fiction)
"I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
The Codex Quaerendae (my philosophy)  The Chronicles of Quelouva (my fiction)
 somitomi
 Posts: 702
 Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2015 11:21 pm UTC
 Location: can be found in Hungary
 Contact:
Re: 2034: "Equations"
gcgcgcgc wrote:Given the complexity of many formulae in modern physics, mathematics, etc. and the wide availability of Unicode I'm surprised we haven't gone beyond the standard greek/latin alphabet yet, instead choosing to use diacritics, typeface styles such as blackletter etc.
There are plenty of characters available in other alphabets, Cyrillic, Japanese, Chinese, Egyptian Hieroglyphs and so on. Even emojis might start becoming a standard (why not use a sun for temperature or a car for velocity? just an idea)
Well, I had friends with absolutely no aptitude for drawing and professor handwriting isn't known to produce easily legible greek letters. Based on those two experiences, I would not venture to read any handwritten calculations with tiny cars and chinese logograms in them, but have fun trying.
—◯◯ FG Discord
Re: 2034: "Equations"
Pfhorrest wrote:Aleph is Hebrew, not Arabic.
So is bet.
All the standard numerals are Arabic, though.
(Unless you ask an actual Arab, then they're Indian).
Good point. The first two letters of the Arabic alphabet are also called "aleph" and "beth" (both with a variety of transliterations), but look very different.
Re: 2034: "Equations"
I am not sure that we are supposed to take this one seriously, at least not literally.
e to the (pi  infinity)? when pi is an index between something finite and infinity? this is probably a joke about using symbols with previous meaning inappropriately
HEAT > H2EAT is probably a joke.... the equations balances, sort of... but H2EAT? Would give you gas...
Kinematics only for scalar potentials? Wasa matter, you don't like magnetism? And if we were really talking universal, we would have to do everything in at least 4 space...
And a lot of glyphs that I have never seen before...
Secrets of the Universe indeed... 42 belongs there somewhere.
And, so damn it... where are the pyramids in all of this?
ajohnso
(not that I would suggest that RM would not have a secret meaning to his list... but perhaps the secret meaning is the lack of meaning?)
e to the (pi  infinity)? when pi is an index between something finite and infinity? this is probably a joke about using symbols with previous meaning inappropriately
HEAT > H2EAT is probably a joke.... the equations balances, sort of... but H2EAT? Would give you gas...
Kinematics only for scalar potentials? Wasa matter, you don't like magnetism? And if we were really talking universal, we would have to do everything in at least 4 space...
And a lot of glyphs that I have never seen before...
Secrets of the Universe indeed... 42 belongs there somewhere.
And, so damn it... where are the pyramids in all of this?
ajohnso
(not that I would suggest that RM would not have a secret meaning to his list... but perhaps the secret meaning is the lack of meaning?)
 CorruptUser
 Posts: 10440
 Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:12 pm UTC
Re: 2034: "Equations"
I suggest we translate the Hebrew letters into English before using them, based on their original Phoenician meanings. "Aleph" is "ox", "Bet" is "house", "Gimel" is "camel" (at least THAT one didn't change too much)...
Re: 2034: "Equations"
I think we should start using digammas for functions.
 Sableagle
 Ormurinn's Alt
 Posts: 2022
 Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:26 pm UTC
 Location: The wrong side of the mirror
 Contact:
Re: 2034: "Equations"
rmsgrey wrote:Pfhorrest wrote:Aleph is Hebrew, not Arabic.
So is bet.
All the standard numerals are Arabic, though.
(Unless you ask an actual Arab, then they're Indian).
Good point. The first two letters of the Arabic alphabet are also called "aleph" and "beth" (both with a variety of transliterations), but look very different.
Using the Arabic aleph would confuse people, because it's just I sloping the other way.
I still hope Doctor Who runs out of letters at the ends of Greek and Roman alphabets and starts using the Arabic one, though, because watching the cast try to maintain straight faces while talking about how long the hashielded windows will protect them from the 100% wowtonic environment while the engineers are repairing the yaydrive could make the show worth watching.
Oh, Willie McBride, it was all done in vain.

 Posts: 40
 Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 3:39 pm UTC
Re: 2034: "Equations"
Well, in a way, we already do  though that particular digamma is actually coincidental!SpitValve wrote:I think we should start using digammas for functions.
There is also one known use of Cyrillic: Ш is the TateShafarevich group (and a few other things, apparently, but this particular use is definitely the Cyrillic letter).
I'm surprised that runes and Japanese kana don't see more use, though...
(Oh, and the one alphabet that I think would be awesome to see in math? Glagolitic.)
 Soupspoon
 You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
 Posts: 3962
 Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
 Location: 531
Re: 2034: "Equations"
+ ( ^ (  ) ) = / (  ) + k_{thanxbye}
Re: 2034: "Equations"
I think it's missing the most fundamental equation "f(x) = g(x)".
ⰒⰎⰉⰈ ⰐⰑ!
Lothario O'Leary wrote:(Oh, and the one alphabet that I think would be awesome to see in math? Glagolitic.)
ⰒⰎⰉⰈ ⰐⰑ!
Re: 2034: "Equations"
most important equation? My vote is for:
U+2205 U+2260 U+2205
If you want that in a prose form... "everything can be divided into two categories  those things that can be divided into two categories, and those that can't".
watch for inappropriate binaries.
aljohnso
U+2205 U+2260 U+2205
If you want that in a prose form... "everything can be divided into two categories  those things that can be divided into two categories, and those that can't".
watch for inappropriate binaries.
aljohnso
 GlassHouses
 Posts: 162
 Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2016 12:41 pm UTC
Re: 2034: "Equations"
aljohnso wrote:most important equation? My vote is for:
U+2205 U+2260 U+2205
If you want that in a prose form... "everything can be divided into two categories  those things that can be divided into two categories, and those that can't".
watch for inappropriate binaries.
aljohnso
So,
∅ ≠ ∅
My prose interpretation of that is "an empty set is not equal to an empty set," which doesn't sound like an important equation, but rather, it sounds wrong.
 Quizatzhaderac
 Posts: 1682
 Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:28 pm UTC
 Location: Space Florida
Re: 2034: "Equations"
It depends on who you are defining things and which axioms you pick. Within ZFC that's wrong, but it's probably true in some formulations of set theory which don't assume an excluded middle (P doesn't necessarily equal ~~P).
The thing about recursion problems is that they tend to contain other recursion problems.